Hesketh Anne
Human Communication and Deafness, School of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2004 Oct-Dec;39(4):453-68. doi: 10.1080/13682820410001686013.
There are conflicting reports in the research literature of the literacy outcome of children with speech disorder. The link between phonological awareness and literacy in typically developing and literacy delayed children is well established, but there is less research specifically into children with an isolated speech disorder (i.e. with age-appropriate language skills). There is a clinical need for clarification on their likely outcome as a group and for a means of predicting those individuals who might need support in literacy development.
To assess literacy and phonological awareness skills at age 6;6-7;6 years in children with a history of speech disorder, and to identify factors in their early profile that were predictive of later achievement.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: Thirty-five children who had participated in an earlier therapy research study agreed to further assessment of their speech, language and literacy abilities. The children had originally been recruited between the ages of 3;6 and 5;0 years as having a moderate-to-severe speech disorder, and there were measures at that time of their non-verbal, language, phonological output and phonological awareness abilities. Follow-up assessments of phonological awareness, speech and early literacy were undertaken.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: As a group, the children had made good progress in speech and showed phonological awareness and literacy development at an age-appropriate level. However, a small number of children had phonological awareness and literacy delay. Phonological awareness at 3;6-5;0 years was the best predictor of literacy achievement.
Speech and language therapists can be confident about the early literacy achievement of most children with isolated speech disorder, but should undertake assessment of phonological awareness to identify those children whose phonological awareness skills after speech intervention continue to be low.
研究文献中关于言语障碍儿童识字结果的报道相互矛盾。在发育正常和识字延迟的儿童中,语音意识与识字之间的联系已得到充分证实,但针对单纯言语障碍儿童(即语言技能与年龄相符)的专门研究较少。临床上需要明确这一群体可能的结果,并需要一种方法来预测那些在识字发展中可能需要支持的个体。
评估有言语障碍病史的儿童在6岁6个月至7岁6个月时的识字和语音意识技能,并确定其早期特征中预测后期成就的因素。
35名曾参与早期治疗研究的儿童同意进一步评估他们的言语、语言和识字能力。这些儿童最初在3岁6个月至5岁时被招募,患有中度至重度言语障碍,当时对他们的非言语、语言、语音输出和语音意识能力进行了测量。对语音意识、言语和早期识字进行了随访评估。
总体而言,这些儿童在言语方面取得了良好进展,语音意识和识字发展达到了与年龄相符的水平。然而,少数儿童存在语音意识和识字延迟。3岁6个月至5岁时的语音意识是识字成就的最佳预测指标。
言语和语言治疗师可以对大多数单纯言语障碍儿童的早期识字成就充满信心,但应进行语音意识评估,以识别那些在言语干预后语音意识技能仍然较低的儿童。