Michaud L
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Dept. of Pediatrics, Lille University Children's Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Lille, France.
Endoscopy. 2005 Feb;37(2):167-70. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826144.
A survey of sedation usage in children undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was undertaken among the members of the Francophone Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology, and Nutrition Group.
A questionnaire regarding the mode of sedation used for noninterventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, relative to the patient's age and clinical condition, was sent to all members of the Group. The sample included 51 pediatric endoscopy centers (33 university hospitals, eight general hospitals, and 10 private practices).
The response rate was 84 % (43 of 51) overall, and 100 % for university hospitals. Forty percent of the pediatric endoscopy centers routinely offered children and/or parents a choice between general anesthesia and conscious sedation. Only 14 % of the pediatric endoscopists surveyed routinely conducted upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under general anesthesia, irrespective of the patient's age or the indication for endoscopy. Patients under the age of 6 months underwent endoscopy as follows: 35 % under conscious sedation, 22 % under general anesthesia, and 43 % with no sedation. After the age of 6 months, endoscopy was conducted as follows: 45 % under conscious sedation, 47 % under general anesthesia, and 8 % with no sedation. Midazolam was the most common drug used for conscious sedation. In patients aged 3 - 5, inhaled nitrous oxide was used instead of midazolam for conscious sedation in 12 % of pediatric endoscopies, and local anesthesia with lidocaine (Xylocaine) in 24 %. In those over the age of 5, the proportions of centers using inhaled nitrous oxide and lidocaine increased to 19 % and 42 %, respectively.
These results clearly show that the mode of sedation used in noninterventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the pediatric age group is highly variable.
在法语区儿科肝病、胃肠病和营养小组的成员中,开展了一项针对接受诊断性上消化道内镜检查的儿童镇静使用情况的调查。
向该小组的所有成员发送了一份关于非介入性上消化道内镜检查所使用的镇静方式(与患者年龄和临床状况相关)的问卷。样本包括51个儿科内镜检查中心(33家大学医院、8家综合医院和10家私人诊所)。
总体回复率为84%(51家中心中的43家),大学医院的回复率为100%。40%的儿科内镜检查中心常规为儿童和/或家长提供全身麻醉和清醒镇静之间的选择。在接受调查的儿科内镜医师中,只有14%的人常规在全身麻醉下进行上消化道内镜检查,无论患者年龄或内镜检查指征如何。年龄在6个月以下的患者接受内镜检查的情况如下:35%在清醒镇静下进行,22%在全身麻醉下进行,43%未使用镇静。6个月以上的患者,内镜检查情况如下:45%在清醒镇静下进行,47%在全身麻醉下进行,8%未使用镇静。咪达唑仑是清醒镇静最常用的药物。在3至5岁的患者中,12%的儿科内镜检查在清醒镇静时使用吸入笑气而非咪达唑仑,24%使用利多卡因(赛罗卡因)局部麻醉。在5岁以上的患者中,使用吸入笑气和利多卡因的中心比例分别增至19%和42%。
这些结果清楚地表明,儿科年龄组非介入性上消化道内镜检查所使用的镇静方式差异很大。