Matson-Koffman Dyann M, Brownstein J Nell, Neiner Jennifer A, Greaney Mary L
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(3):167-93. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.3.167.
To review the literature to determine whether policy and environmental interventions can increase people's physical activity or improve their nutrition.
The following databases were searched for relevant intervention studies: Medline, Chronic Disease Prevention File, PsychInfo, Health Star, Web of Science, ERIC, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
To be included in the review, studies must have (1) addressed policy or environmental interventions to promote physical activity and/or good nutrition; (2) been published from 1970 to October 2003; (3) provided a description of the intervention; and (4) reported behavioral, physiological, or organizational change outcomes. Studies that had inadequate intervention descriptions or that focused on determinants research, individual-level interventions only, the built environment, or media-only campaigns were excluded.
We extracted and summarized studies conducted before 1990 (n = 65) and during 1990-2003 (n = 64).
Data were synthesized by topic (i.e., physical activity or nutrition), by type of intervention (i.e., point-of-purchase), and by setting (i.e., community, health care facility, school, worksite). Current studies published during 1990-2003 are described in more detail, including setting and location, sample size and characteristics, intervention, evaluation period, findings, and research design. Findings are also categorized by type of intervention to show the strength of the study designs and the associations of policy and environmental interventions with physical activity and nutrition.
The results of our review suggest that policy and environmental strategies may promote physical activity and good nutrition. Based on the experimental and quasi-experimental studies in this review, the following interventions provide the strongest evidence for influencing these behaviors: prompts to increase stair use (N = 5); access to places and opportunities for physical activity (N = 6); school-based physical education (PE) with better-trained PE teachers, and increased length of time students are physically active (N = 7); comprehensive work-site approaches, including education, employee and peer support for physical activity, incentives, and access to exercise facilities (N = 5); the availability of nutritious foods (N = 33), point-of-purchase strategies (N = 29); and systematic officer reminders and training of health care providers to provide nutritional counseling (N = 4). Further research is needed to determine the long-term effectiveness of different policy and environmental interventions with various populations and to identify the steps necessary to successfully implement these types of interventions.
回顾文献,以确定政策和环境干预措施是否能增加人们的身体活动或改善其营养状况。
检索了以下数据库以查找相关干预研究:医学索引数据库(Medline)、慢性病预防档案库、心理学文摘数据库(PsychInfo)、健康之星数据库、科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)、教育资源信息中心数据库(ERIC)、美国运输部数据库和美国农业部数据库。
要纳入该综述,研究必须具备以下条件:(1)涉及促进身体活动和/或良好营养的政策或环境干预措施;(2)发表于1970年至2003年10月期间;(3)对干预措施进行了描述;(4)报告了行为、生理或组织方面的变化结果。干预描述不充分或仅关注决定因素研究、仅针对个体层面的干预措施、建筑环境或仅涉及媒体宣传活动的研究被排除。
我们提取并总结了1990年之前(n = 65)和1990 - 2003年期间(n = 64)开展的研究。
数据按主题(即身体活动或营养)、干预类型(即购买点)和环境(即社区、医疗保健机构、学校、工作场所)进行综合。对1990 - 2003年期间发表的当前研究进行了更详细的描述,包括环境和地点、样本大小及特征、干预措施、评估期、研究结果和研究设计。研究结果也按干预类型进行分类,以展示研究设计的力度以及政策和环境干预措施与身体活动和营养之间的关联。
我们的综述结果表明,政策和环境策略可能促进身体活动和良好营养。基于本综述中的实验性和准实验性研究,以下干预措施为影响这些行为提供了最有力的证据:增加楼梯使用的提示(N = 5);获得进行身体活动的场所和机会(N = 6);配备训练有素的体育教师并增加学生身体活动时间的学校体育教育(N = 7);全面的工作场所方法,包括教育、员工和同伴对身体活动的支持、激励措施以及使用健身设施的机会(N = 5);提供营养丰富的食物(N = 33)、购买点策略(N = 29);以及系统的医护人员提醒和对医护人员进行提供营养咨询的培训(N = 4)。需要进一步研究以确定不同政策和环境干预措施对不同人群的长期有效性,并确定成功实施此类干预措施所需的步骤。