Suppr超能文献

针对日托中心健康儿童接种流感病毒疫苗的家庭成本与效益:一项试点研究的结果

Household-based costs and benefits of vaccinating healthy children in daycare against influenza virus: results from a pilot study.

作者信息

Pisu Maria, Meltzer Martin I, Hurwitz Eugene S, Haber Michael

机构信息

Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education (COERE), University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-4410, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(1):55-67. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523010-00005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vaccinating children against influenza virus may reduce infections in immunised children and household contacts, thereby reducing the household-based cost associated with respiratory illnesses.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of influenza virus vaccination of daycare children on costs of respiratory illnesses of the children and their household contacts from the household and societal perspective.

STUDY DESIGN

Cost analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial covering the period November to April of 1996-7 and 1998-9. Children (127 in 1996-7 and 133 in 1998-9) from daycare centres in Californian (USA) naval bases received influenza virus vaccine (inactivated) or hepatitis A virus vaccination.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Direct and indirect costs (1997 and 1999 US dollars) of respiratory illnesses in households of vaccinated and not vaccinated daycare children, excluding the cost of vaccination.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in household costs of respiratory illness between households with or without influenza virus-vaccinated children (USD 635 vs USD 492: p = 0.98 [1996-7]; USD 412.70 vs USD 499.50: p = 0.42 [1998-9]). In 1996-7, adult and 5- to 17-year-old contacts of vaccinated children had lower household costs than contacts of unvaccinated children (USD 58.50 vs USD 83.20, p = 0.01 and USD 32.80 vs USD 59.50, p = 0.04, respectively), while vaccinated children 0-4 years old had higher household costs than unvaccinated children in the same age group (USD 383 vs USD 236, p = 0.05). In 1998-9, there were no differences within individual age groups. Results from societal perspective were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, from both the household and societal perspectives, there were no economic benefits to households from vaccinating daycare children against influenza virus. However, we found some over-time inconsistency in results; this should be considered if changing recommendations about routine influenza virus vaccination of healthy children. Our study size may limit the generalisability of the results.

摘要

背景

给儿童接种流感病毒疫苗可减少免疫儿童及其家庭接触者的感染,从而降低与呼吸道疾病相关的家庭成本。

目的

从家庭和社会角度评估日托儿童接种流感病毒疫苗对儿童及其家庭接触者呼吸道疾病成本的影响。

研究设计

对1996 - 1997年11月至4月以及1998 - 1999年期间一项随机对照试验的数据进行成本分析。美国加利福尼亚海军基地日托中心的儿童(1996 - 1997年有127名,1998 - 1999年有133名)接种了流感病毒疫苗(灭活)或甲型肝炎病毒疫苗。

观察指标

接种和未接种流感病毒疫苗的日托儿童家庭中呼吸道疾病的直接和间接成本(1997年和1999年美元),不包括疫苗接种成本。

结果

有或没有接种流感病毒疫苗儿童的家庭,其呼吸道疾病的家庭成本在统计学上无显著差异(1996 - 1997年:635美元对492美元,p = 0.98;1998 - 1999年:412.70美元对499.50美元,p = 0.42)。1996 - 1997年,接种疫苗儿童的成人及5至17岁接触者的家庭成本低于未接种疫苗儿童的接触者(分别为58.50美元对83.20美元,p = 0.01;32.80美元对59.50美元,p = 0.04),而0至4岁接种疫苗儿童的家庭成本高于同年龄组未接种疫苗的儿童(383美元对236美元,p = 0.05)。1998 - 1999年,各年龄组内无差异。从社会角度得出的结果相似。

结论

总体而言,从家庭和社会角度来看,给日托儿童接种流感病毒疫苗对家庭没有经济效益。然而,我们发现结果随时间存在一些不一致性;如果改变关于健康儿童常规接种流感病毒疫苗的建议,应考虑这一点。我们的研究规模可能会限制结果的普遍性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验