De Munck Jan, Van Landuyt Kirsten L, Coutinho Eduardo, Poitevin André, Peumans Marleen, Lambrechts Paul, Braem Marc, Van Meerbeek Bart
Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-facial Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 Feb;113(1):77-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00185.x.
According to the "elastic bonding" concept, a thick intermediate layer of flexible resin has been suggested to absorb part of the polymerization shrinkage stress and to absorb shocks during function. In this study, the effect of an additional intermediate layer of a low-viscosity resin on the microrotary fatigue resistance (microRFR) of a hybrid composite bonded to dentin was evaluated. The hypotheses tested were that an intermediate layer of a low-viscosity resin (i) increases the microRFR to dentin, but (ii) has no effect on the static bond strength. Microtensile bond strength (microTBS) samples were loaded until failure or inserted in a microrotary fatigue testing device. Specimens were tested at 4 Hz until failure or until 10(5) cycles were reached. An additional intermediate elastic layer had no effect on the static microTBS, but significantly lowered the median microRFR from 28.4 MPa to 21.6 MPa. However, the application of an intermediate flexible layer had, no effect on the static microTBS. In conclusion, an additional elastic intermediate layer did decrease significantly the microRFR (rejection of hypothesis i), but did not alter the microTBS (acceptance of hypothesis ii). The decrease in microRFR most likely may be explained by the lower mechanical properties of the intermediary layer.
根据“弹性粘结”概念,有人提出用一层较厚的柔性树脂中间层来吸收部分聚合收缩应力,并在功能过程中吸收冲击。在本研究中,评估了低粘度树脂附加中间层对粘结于牙本质的混合复合材料微旋转疲劳抗力(microRFR)的影响。所检验的假设为:低粘度树脂中间层(i)可提高对牙本质的microRFR,但(ii)对静态粘结强度无影响。微拉伸粘结强度(microTBS)样本加载直至破坏,或插入微旋转疲劳测试装置中。样本以4 Hz进行测试,直至破坏或达到10⁵次循环。附加的中间弹性层对静态microTBS无影响,但显著降低了中位microRFR,从28.4 MPa降至21.6 MPa。然而,应用中间柔性层对静态microTBS无影响。总之,附加的弹性中间层确实显著降低了microRFR(假设i被拒绝),但未改变microTBS(假设ii被接受)。microRFR的降低很可能可由中间层较低的力学性能来解释。