Coelho P G, Calamia C, Harsono M, Thompson V P, Silva N R F A
Department of Prosthodontics, New York University College of Dentistry, NY 10010, USA.
Dent Mater. 2008 Oct;24(10):1297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that microtensile bond strength values are inversely proportional to dentin-to-composite adhesive layer thickness through laboratory mechanical testing and finite element analysis.
Eighteen noncarious third molars were obtained, and occlusal enamel removed perpendicular to the tooth long axis. Two different adhesive systems were utilized as follows (n=3): (1) application of a single layer of Single Bond (3M ESPE Co.) and Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Co.) following the manufacturer's directions; (2) application of one layer of both adhesive systems followed by one additional layer; (3) application of one layer of both adhesive systems followed by two additional layers. A 4mm build up was fabricated in increments on each tooth sample (Z 100 composite, 3M ESPE). Section measurements were performed and specimens were separated into three adhesive thickness groups per material (40, 40-80 and 80-120 microm) for microtensile testing. The bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Maximum principal stresses (MPS) were determined through FEA for three different adhesive layer thicknesses (20, 50 and 100 microm).
The bond strength data obtained for Single Bond at 0-40 microm presented significantly higher values compared to higher adhesive layer thickness groups. There were no statistical differences among bond strength values for all Clearfil SE Bond adhesive layer thicknesses. FEA modeling indicated that MPS increased as adhesive layer increased. The hypothesis was accepted for the Single Bond only.
Correspondence (not tested statistically) between microtensile laboratory testing and FEA model was only observed for Single Bond as increased adhesive layer thickness did not reduce Clearfil SE Bond strength.
本研究旨在通过实验室力学测试和有限元分析,验证微拉伸粘结强度值与牙本质 - 复合树脂粘结剂层厚度成反比这一假设。
获取18颗非龋性第三磨牙,垂直于牙长轴去除咬合面釉质。使用两种不同的粘结系统,如下所示(n = 3):(1)按照制造商说明应用单层Single Bond(3M ESPE公司)和Clearfil SE Bond(可乐丽公司);(2)应用一层两种粘结系统,然后再额外应用一层;(3)应用一层两种粘结系统,然后再额外应用两层。在每个牙齿样本上逐步构建4mm的堆积物(Z 100复合树脂,3M ESPE)。进行切片测量,并将样本按每种材料分为三个粘结剂厚度组(40、40 - 80和80 - 120微米)进行微拉伸测试。通过单因素方差分析和Tukey检验分析粘结强度数据(MPa)。通过有限元分析确定三种不同粘结剂层厚度(20、50和100微米)下的最大主应力(MPS)。
与较高粘结剂层厚度组相比,在0 - 40微米处获得的Single Bond粘结强度数据值显著更高。所有Clearfil SE Bond粘结剂层厚度的粘结强度值之间无统计学差异。有限元分析模型表明,随着粘结剂层增加,最大主应力增加。仅对于Single Bond接受了该假设。
仅在Single Bond中观察到微拉伸实验室测试与有限元分析模型之间的对应关系(未进行统计学测试),因为增加的粘结剂层厚度并未降低Clearfil SE Bond的强度。