Williams Stephen R, Searles Debra J, Evans Denis J
Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Dec;70(6 Pt 2):066113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066113. Epub 2004 Dec 6.
The fluctuation theorems show how macroscopic irreversibility arises from time reversible microscopic dynamics. They have been confirmed in computer simulations and in laboratory experiments. The standard proofs of the transient fluctuation theorems involve the use of time reversible deterministic thermostats to control the temperature of the system of interest. These mathematical thermostats do not occur in Nature. However, since in a gedanken experiment the thermostatting regions can be removed arbitrarily far from the system of interest, it has been argued that the precise details of the thermostat cannot be important and that the resulting fluctuation theorems apply to natural systems. In this paper we give a detailed analysis showing how the fluctuation theorem is independent of the precise mathematical details of the thermostatting mechanism for an infinite class of fictitious time reversible deterministic thermostats. Our analysis reinforces the implications of the gedanken experiment and implies that thermostats used in the derivations of fluctuation theorems are a convenient but ultimately irrelevant device.
涨落定理展示了宏观不可逆性是如何从时间可逆的微观动力学中产生的。它们已在计算机模拟和实验室实验中得到证实。瞬态涨落定理的标准证明涉及使用时间可逆的确定性恒温器来控制感兴趣系统的温度。这些数学恒温器在自然界中并不存在。然而,由于在一个思想实验中,恒温区域可以被放置得离感兴趣的系统任意远,有人认为恒温器的精确细节并不重要,由此产生的涨落定理适用于自然系统。在本文中,我们给出了详细分析,展示了涨落定理如何独立于一类无限的虚拟时间可逆确定性恒温器的恒温机制的精确数学细节。我们的分析强化了思想实验的意义,并意味着在涨落定理推导中使用的恒温器是一种方便但最终无关紧要的装置。