Neighbors Clayton, Palmer Rebekka S, Larimer Mary E
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
J Stud Alcohol. 2004 Nov;65(6):736-40. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.736.
This research explored the relationship between typical alcohol consumption and interest in participating in a brief alcohol intervention study and between typical consumption and actual participation in the study among students recruited to participate in an intervention study. We predicted a curvilinear relationship as a potential explanation for mixed findings from previous examinations of risk status and participation in alcohol intervention research. That is, we expected an inverted U-shaped relationship, with those at the lowest and highest ends of the drinking spectrum expressing the least interest in participation. We expected the same pattern to hold for likelihood of actual participation among study invitees.
Self-reported typical consumption and interest in participating in an alcohol intervention study were assessed among 1,115 (59.7% female) college students. A subsample of these students (n = 377) who expressed interest and reported at least one heavy-drinking episode in the previous month were subsequently invited to participate in a brief intervention study.
Drinkers were more likely than nondrinkers to report interest in participating, and there was a positive relationship between likelihood of expressing interest and typical consumption. However, the predicted quadratic relationship was evident with those at the lowest and highest ends of the drinking spectrum expressing the least interest in participation. The same pattern was also evident for actual participation among the heavy-drinking subsample invited to participate in the alcohol intervention study.
A nonlinear relationship may account for mixed findings regarding the relationship between risk status and participation in alcohol intervention studies. Results are interpreted in terms of psychological relevance and defensiveness. Findings highlight the need for added effort in recruiting, and/or alternative recruitment strategies for, those at highest risk.
本研究探讨了在招募参加一项干预研究的学生中,典型饮酒量与参与简短酒精干预研究的兴趣之间的关系,以及典型饮酒量与实际参与研究之间的关系。我们预测存在一种曲线关系,作为对先前风险状况与参与酒精干预研究的调查结果不一致的一种潜在解释。也就是说,我们预期会呈现倒U形关系,即饮酒范围两端的人群参与兴趣最低。我们预期受邀参加研究的人群中实际参与可能性也呈现相同模式。
在1115名(59.7%为女性)大学生中评估了自我报告的典型饮酒量和参与酒精干预研究的兴趣。随后邀请了这些学生中的一个子样本(n = 377),他们表示有兴趣且报告在前一个月至少有一次酗酒事件,参加一项简短干预研究。
饮酒者比不饮酒者更有可能报告有参与兴趣,且表达兴趣的可能性与典型饮酒量之间存在正相关关系。然而,预测的二次关系很明显,饮酒范围两端的人群参与兴趣最低。在受邀参加酒精干预研究的酗酒子样本中,实际参与情况也呈现相同模式。
非线性关系可能解释了关于风险状况与参与酒精干预研究之间关系的不一致结果。从心理相关性和防御性角度对结果进行了解释。研究结果突出了针对高风险人群在招募方面加大努力和/或采用替代招募策略的必要性。