Siemann Dietmar W, Bibby Michael C, Dark Graham G, Dicker Adam P, Eskens Ferry A L M, Horsman Michael R, Marmé Dieter, Lorusso Patricia M
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, PO Box 100385, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jan 15;11(2 Pt 1):416-20.
The therapeutic potential of targeting the tumor vascular supply is now widely recognized. Intense research and development activity has resulted in a variety of investigational agents, a number of which are currently in clinical development. As these novel agents are quite distinct from the cytotoxic drugs conventionally used in the treatment of solid tumors, it will be particularly important to ensure early differentiation of these vascular-targeted therapies in order to encourage widespread understanding of their potential benefits and application in the clinic. Two distinct groups of vascular-targeted therapies have evolved: antiangiogenic agents and vascular-disrupting approaches. These differ in three key respects: their physiologic target, the type or extent of disease that is likely to be susceptible, and the treatment scheduling. Inhibitors of angiogenesis interfere with new vessel formation and therefore have a preventative action, require chronic administration, and are likely to be of particular benefit in early-stage or asymptomatic metastatic disease. Vascular-disrupting agents target the established tumor blood vessels, resulting in tumor ischemia and necrosis. These agents are therefore given acutely, show more immediate effects, and may have particular efficacy against advanced disease. It is essential that these agents can be readily distinguished from conventional therapies and that an understanding of key differences between the two types of vascular-targeted therapies is fostered. Here, a simple taxonomy and nomenclature is proposed in anticipation that the therapeutic potential of this novel class can be realized as these approaches advance in clinical settings and a new anticancer strategy becomes available in the clinic.
靶向肿瘤血管供应的治疗潜力现已得到广泛认可。大量的研发活动已产生了多种研究性药物,其中一些目前正处于临床开发阶段。由于这些新型药物与传统用于治疗实体瘤的细胞毒性药物截然不同,因此确保这些血管靶向疗法的早期区分尤为重要,以便促进对其潜在益处和临床应用的广泛理解。已发展出两类不同的血管靶向疗法:抗血管生成药物和血管破坏方法。它们在三个关键方面存在差异:其生理靶点、可能易患的疾病类型或程度以及治疗方案。血管生成抑制剂干扰新血管形成,因此具有预防作用,需要长期给药,并且可能对早期或无症状转移性疾病特别有益。血管破坏剂靶向已形成的肿瘤血管,导致肿瘤缺血和坏死。因此,这些药物是急性给药,显示出更直接的效果,并且可能对晚期疾病具有特殊疗效。必须能够轻易将这些药物与传统疗法区分开来,并促进对这两种血管靶向疗法之间关键差异的理解。在此,提出一种简单的分类法和命名法,以期随着这些方法在临床环境中的推进以及一种新的抗癌策略在临床上可用,能够实现这类新型疗法的治疗潜力。