El Mansari Mostafa, Sánchez Connie, Chouvet Guy, Renaud Bernard, Haddjeri Nasser
Laboratory of Neuropharmacology and Neurochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon Cedex, France.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005 Jul;30(7):1269-77. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300686.
The present study was undertaken to compare the acute and long-term effects of escitalopram and citalopram on rat brain 5-HT neurotransmission, using electrophysiological techniques. In hippocampus, after 2 weeks of treatment with escitalopram (10 mg/kg/day, s.c.) or citalopram (20 mg/kg/day, s.c.), the administration of the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY-100,635 (20-100 microg/kg, i.v.) dose-dependently induced a similar increase in the firing activity of dorsal hippocampus CA(3) pyramidal neurons, thus revealing direct functional evidence of an enhanced tonic activation of postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors. In dorsal raphe nucleus, escitalopram was four times more potent than citalopram in suppressing the firing activity of presumed 5-HT neurons (ED(50)=58 and 254 mug/kg, i.v., respectively). Interestingly, the suppressant effect of escitalopram (100 microg/kg, i.v.) was significantly prevented, but not reversed by R-citalopram (250 microg/kg, i.v.). Sustained administration of escitalopram and citalopram significantly decreased the spontaneous firing activity of presumed 5-HT neurons. This firing activity returned to control rate after 2 weeks in rats treated with escitalopram, but only after 3 weeks using citalopram, and was associated with a desensitization of somatodendritic 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors. These results suggest that the time course of the gradual return of presumed 5-HT neuronal firing activity, which was reported to account for the delayed effect of SSRI on 5-HT transmission, is congruent with the earlier onset of action of escitalopram vs citalopram in validated animal models of depression and anxiety.
本研究采用电生理技术,比较艾司西酞普兰和西酞普兰对大鼠脑5-羟色胺(5-HT)神经传递的急性和长期影响。在海马体中,用艾司西酞普兰(10毫克/千克/天,皮下注射)或西酞普兰(20毫克/千克/天,皮下注射)治疗2周后,给予选择性5-HT(1A)受体拮抗剂WAY-100,635(20 - 100微克/千克,静脉注射),剂量依赖性地诱导背侧海马体CA(3)锥体神经元放电活动出现类似增加,从而揭示了突触后5-HT(1A)受体紧张性激活增强的直接功能证据。在中缝背核中,艾司西酞普兰在抑制假定的5-HT神经元放电活动方面的效力比西酞普兰强四倍(半数有效剂量分别为58和254微克/千克,静脉注射)。有趣的是,艾司西酞普兰(100微克/千克,静脉注射)的抑制作用被R-西酞普兰(250微克/千克,静脉注射)显著阻止,但未被逆转。持续给予艾司西酞普兰和西酞普兰显著降低了假定的5-HT神经元的自发放电活动。在用艾司西酞普兰治疗的大鼠中,这种放电活动在2周后恢复到对照水平,但使用西酞普兰时仅在3周后恢复,并且与树突体5-HT(1A)自身受体的脱敏有关。这些结果表明,据报道可解释5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)对5-HT传递延迟作用的假定5-HT神经元放电活动逐渐恢复的时间进程,与艾司西酞普兰在经过验证的抑郁和焦虑动物模型中比西酞普兰起效更早是一致的。