Zito Julie Magno, Safer Daniel J, Zuckerman Ilene H, Gardner James F, Soeken Karen
University of Maryland, Baltimore, 515 West Lombard Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Feb;56(2):157-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.2.157.
This study sought to determine the degree to which Medicaid eligibility categories modify disparities between black and white youths in the prevalence of psychotropic medication.
Computerized claims for 189,486 youths aged two to 19 years who were continuously enrolled in a mid-Atlantic state Medicaid program for the year 2000 were analyzed to determine population-based annual prevalence of psychotropic medication by race or ethnicity and by whether the youths were eligible for Medicaid for reasons of family income, disability, or foster care placement. Logistic regression was used to assess the interaction of eligibility category and race.
The mean annual prevalence of psychotropic medication for the population was 9.9 percent. The prevalence was 2.17 times higher for white youths than for black youths (16.5 percent compared with 7.6 percent). However, within eligibility categories, the white-to-black disparity was 3.8 among youths who were eligible for Medicaid because their family income was below the federal poverty level and 3.2 for youths enrolled in the State Children's Health Insurance Program.
Medicaid eligibility categories had a profound impact on the racial disparity associated with the prevalence of psychotropic medications for youths. Eligibility category should be taken into account when ascertaining the role of access, undertreatment, and culture in disparities in mental health treatment.
本研究旨在确定医疗补助资格类别在多大程度上改变了黑人和白人青少年在精神药物使用流行率方面的差异。
对2000年连续参加大西洋中部某州医疗补助计划的189486名2至19岁青少年的计算机化索赔数据进行分析,以确定按种族或族裔以及青少年是否因家庭收入、残疾或寄养安置而符合医疗补助资格划分的基于人群的精神药物年度流行率。采用逻辑回归评估资格类别与种族之间的相互作用。
该人群精神药物的年平均流行率为9.9%。白人青少年的流行率比黑人青少年高2.17倍(分别为16.5%和7.6%)。然而,在各资格类别中,因家庭收入低于联邦贫困线而符合医疗补助资格的青少年中,白人与黑人的差异为3.8,参加州儿童健康保险计划的青少年中该差异为3.2。
医疗补助资格类别对青少年精神药物流行率相关的种族差异有深远影响。在确定获得治疗的机会、治疗不足和文化在心理健康治疗差异中的作用时,应考虑资格类别。