Caplain H
ASTER-CEPHAC, Paris, France.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;19(4):214-9. doi: 10.1159/000083885. Epub 2005 Feb 8.
Previous studies have shown the potential benefit of using antiplatelet agents with complementary modes of action.
Using a crossover design, the ex vivo antiplatelet effects of 10 days' treatment with clopidogrel 75 mg + acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 75 mg daily, ASA 75 mg/day, or extended-release dipyridamole 200 mg/low-dose ASA 25 mg twice daily were compared, using various platelet agonists.
Clopidogrel + ASA was significantly more effective than dipyridamole + ASA in inhibiting collagen-induced platelet aggregation in whole blood (mean 44.9 +/- 5.6% inhibition vs. 16.5 +/- 6.7%; p = 0.0009). Clopidogrel + ASA was significantly more effective than ASA or dipyridamole + ASA in inhibiting ADP-induced platelet aggregation in whole blood (p < or = 0.0001) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (p < or = 0.0001), and in inhibiting collagen-induced aggregation in PRP (p < or = 0.0001). ASA alone and clopidogrel + ASA were significantly more effective than dipyridamole + ASA in inhibiting arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation in whole blood (p < or = 0.0001).
Based on ex vivo platelet aggregometry, clopidogrel + ASA is a more potent antiplatelet regimen than either ASA alone or the marketed combination of dipyridamole + ASA. However, the clinical significance of this finding remains to be confirmed.
既往研究显示,联合使用具有互补作用模式的抗血小板药物可能有益。
采用交叉设计,比较每日服用氯吡格雷75毫克+乙酰水杨酸(ASA)75毫克、ASA 75毫克/天或缓释双嘧达莫200毫克/低剂量ASA 25毫克,每日两次,连续治疗10天的体外抗血小板作用,使用多种血小板激动剂。
在抑制全血中胶原诱导的血小板聚集方面,氯吡格雷+ASA比双嘧达莫+ASA显著更有效(平均抑制率44.9±5.6%对16.5±6.7%;p = 0.0009)。在抑制全血(p≤0.0001)和富血小板血浆(PRP)(p≤0.0001)中ADP诱导的血小板聚集以及抑制PRP中胶原诱导的聚集方面,氯吡格雷+ASA比ASA或双嘧达莫+ASA显著更有效(p≤0.0001)。在抑制全血中花生四烯酸诱导的血小板聚集方面,单独使用ASA和氯吡格雷+ASA比双嘧达莫+ASA显著更有效(p≤0.0001)。
基于体外血小板聚集测定,氯吡格雷+ASA是一种比单独使用ASA或市售的双嘧达莫+ASA组合更有效的抗血小板方案。然而,这一发现的临床意义仍有待证实。