Cooke Glen E, Liu-Stratton Yiwen, Ferketich Amy K, Moeschberger Melvin L, Frid David J, Magorien Raymond D, Bray Paul F, Binkley Philip F, Goldschmidt-Clermont Pascal J
Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1252, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.034. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
We studied the modifier effect of platelet antigen polymorphism (PlA2) on platelet inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, i.e., aspirin), clopidogrel, or their combination in patients with coronary heart disease.
Clopidogrel, when administered with ASA, was shown to significantly improve the outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes compared with patients receiving only ASA. We have shown previously that the effect of ASA on platelets is modified by the glycoprotein IIIa single nucleotide polymorphism PlA2. Hence, an important pharmacogenetic question remains whether the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel is uniform for all patients or, like acetylsalicylic acid, more selective.
Thirty PlA1/A1 and 30 PlA1/A2 patients were assigned randomly to ASA 325 mg/day, clopidogrel 75 mg/day, or both. After 10 days, platelet function was studied.
Clopidogrel provided stronger platelet inhibition than ASA with adenosine diphosphate as the agonist, and combination therapy resulted in greater inhibition than either inhibitor used alone (p < 0.0001). The use of ASA resulted in greater inhibition compared with clopidogrel with epinephrine (p < 0.0001) and collagen as agonists (p < 0.0001). With collagen as the agonist, platelets from PlA1/A2 donors were markedly and significantly less inhibited by ASA (p = 0.005). In contrast, with clopidogrel, no significant difference could be detected between inhibition of Pl(A1/A1) and Pl(A1/A2) platelets.
The combination of ASA and clopidogrel appears superior to either agent alone in inhibiting platelet function. Pl(A2) functions as an important modifier for platelet responsiveness to ASA but not to clopidogrel. These findings could have significant impact on the future design of pharmacogenetic antithrombotic strategies for patients with coronary heart disease.
我们研究了血小板抗原多态性(PlA2)对冠心病患者中乙酰水杨酸(ASA,即阿司匹林)、氯吡格雷或其联合用药所致血小板抑制的修饰作用。
与仅接受ASA治疗的患者相比,氯吡格雷与ASA联合使用时,已显示能显著改善急性冠脉综合征患者的预后。我们之前已经表明,糖蛋白IIIa单核苷酸多态性PlA2会改变ASA对血小板的作用。因此,一个重要的药物遗传学问题仍然存在,即氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用对所有患者是否一致,还是像乙酰水杨酸一样更具选择性。
30名PlA1/A1患者和30名PlA1/A2患者被随机分配至每日服用325mg ASA、75mg氯吡格雷或两者联用组。10天后,研究血小板功能。
以二磷酸腺苷为激动剂时,氯吡格雷比ASA能更有效地抑制血小板,联合治疗比单独使用任何一种抑制剂都能产生更强的抑制作用(p<0.0001)。以肾上腺素(p<0.0001)和胶原为激动剂时,与氯吡格雷相比,使用ASA能产生更强的抑制作用(p<0.0001)。以胶原为激动剂时,来自PlA1/A2供体的血小板受ASA抑制的程度明显显著更低(p=0.005)。相比之下,对于氯吡格雷,在抑制Pl(A1/A1)和Pl(A1/A2)血小板之间未检测到显著差异。
ASA和氯吡格雷联合使用在抑制血小板功能方面似乎优于单独使用任何一种药物。Pl(A2)是血小板对ASA反应性的重要修饰因子,但对氯吡格雷并非如此。这些发现可能会对未来冠心病患者药物遗传学抗血栓策略的设计产生重大影响。