Taylor J David, Bandy William D
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, Arkansas 72035, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):163-8. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2005)19<163:IRORME>2.0.CO;2.
The purpose of this study was to determine intrarater reliability of the 1 repetition maximum (1RM) estimation for shoulder internal rotation. The accuracy of the estimated 1RM was determined by establishing the actual 1RM. Fifteen subjects were positioned supine with the shoulder in 0 degrees abduction (position 1) and prone with the shoulder in 90 degrees abduction (position 2). Subjects were placed in both testing positions and performed resisted shoulder internal rotation. A 1RM estimation equation was used to estimate shoulder internal rotation strength. After 1 week, procedures were repeated and intrarater reliability was calculated. One week after 1RM estimation procedures were completed, the accuracy of an estimated 1RM was determined by establishing an actual 1RM. The results indicated excellent intrarater reliability for position 1 (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.99) and position 2 (ICC = 0.96). The correlation coefficients for accuracy indicated excellent concurrent validation was attained for position 1 (ICC = 0.99) and position 2 (ICC = 0.97). Shoulder internal rotation 1RM estimation appears to be reliable and accurate. Clinicians may use submaximal loads to estimate the 1RM and decrease the possibility of injury during actual 1RM strength testing.
本研究的目的是确定肩部内旋1次重复最大值(1RM)估计的评估者内信度。通过确定实际的1RM来确定估计的1RM的准确性。15名受试者分别处于仰卧位,肩部外展0度(姿势1)和俯卧位,肩部外展90度(姿势2)。受试者处于两种测试姿势并进行抗阻肩部内旋。使用1RM估计方程来估计肩部内旋力量。1周后,重复操作并计算评估者内信度。在完成1RM估计程序1周后,通过确定实际的1RM来确定估计的1RM的准确性。结果表明姿势1(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.99)和姿势2(ICC=0.96)具有出色的评估者内信度。准确性的相关系数表明姿势1(ICC=0.99)和姿势2(ICC=0.97)获得了出色的同时效度。肩部内旋1RM估计似乎可靠且准确。临床医生可以使用次最大负荷来估计1RM,并降低实际1RM力量测试期间受伤的可能性。