Suppr超能文献

测量肩外旋和内旋力量及活动范围:多项测试方案的综合内部和外部测试者信度研究。

Measuring shoulder external and internal rotation strength and range of motion: comprehensive intra-rater and inter-rater reliability study of several testing protocols.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Oct;23(10):1454-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shoulder range of motion (ROM) and strength measurements are imperative in the clinical assessment of the patient's status and progression over time. The method and type of assessment varies among clinicians and institutions. No comprehensive study to date has examined the reliability of a variety of procedures based on different testing equipment and specific patient or shoulder position. The purpose of this study was to establish absolute and relative reliability for several procedures measuring the rotational shoulder ROM and strength into internal (IR) and external (ER) rotation strength.

METHODS

Thirty healthy individuals (15 male, 15 female), with a mean age of 22.1 ± 1.4 years, were examined by 2 examiners who measured ROM with a goniometer and inclinometer and isometric strength with a hand-held dynamometer (HHD) in different patient and shoulder positions. Relative reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Absolute reliability was quantified by standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Systematic differences across trials or between testers, as well as differences among similar measurements under different testing circumstances, were analyzed with dependent t tests or repeated-measures analysis of variance in case of 2 or more than 2 conditions, respectively.

RESULTS

Reliability was good to excellent for IR and ER ROM and isometric strength measurements, regardless of patient or shoulder position or equipment used (ICC, 0.85-0.99). For some of the measurements, systematic differences were found across trials or between testers. The patient's position and the equipment used resulted in different outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

All procedures examined showed acceptable reliability for clinical use. However, patient position and equipment might influence the results.

摘要

背景

肩部活动范围(ROM)和力量测量在评估患者的状态和随时间推移的进展方面至关重要。评估的方法和类型因临床医生和机构而异。迄今为止,尚无综合研究根据不同的测试设备和特定的患者或肩部位置,检查各种程序的可靠性。本研究的目的是确定几种测量旋转肩部 ROM 和力量的程序的绝对和相对可靠性,这些程序将内部(IR)和外部(ER)旋转力量分为两种。

方法

30 名健康个体(15 名男性,15 名女性),平均年龄为 22.1±1.4 岁,由 2 名检查者进行检查,检查者使用量角器和测斜仪测量 ROM,使用手持测力计(HHD)在不同的患者和肩部位置测量等长力量。相对可靠性通过组内相关系数(ICC)确定。绝对可靠性通过测量误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC)来量化。系统差异跨试验或检查者,以及在不同测试环境下的相似测量之间的差异,使用独立样本 t 检验或重复测量方差分析进行分析,如果有 2 个或更多条件,则分别进行分析。

结果

无论患者或肩部位置或使用的设备如何,IR 和 ER ROM 和等长力量测量的可靠性均为良好至优秀(ICC,0.85-0.99)。对于某些测量,跨试验或检查者存在系统差异。患者的位置和使用的设备导致了不同的测量结果。

结论

所有检查的程序对于临床使用均显示出可接受的可靠性。然而,患者的位置和设备可能会影响结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验