Stpiczyńska M, Davies K L, Gregg A
Department of Botany, Agricultural University, Akademicka 15, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Ann Bot. 2005 Apr;95(5):749-56. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci081. Epub 2005 Feb 10.
Despite the number of orchid species that are thought to be pollinated by hummingbirds, our knowledge of the nectaries of these orchids is based solely on a single species, Maxillaria coccinea (Jacq.) L.O. Williams ex Hodge. Nevertheless, it is predicted that such nectaries are likely to be very diverse and the purpose of this paper is to compare the nectary and the process of nectar secretion in Hexisea imbricata (Lindl.) Rchb.f. with that of Maxillaria coccinea so as to begin to characterize the nectaries of presumed ornithophilous Neotropical orchids.
Light microscopy, transmission electronmicroscopy and histochemistry were used to examine the histology and chemical composition of nectary tissue and the process of nectar secretion in H. imbricata.
The nectary of H. imbricata has a vascular supply, is bound by a single-layered epidermis with few stomata and comprises two or three layers of subepidermal secretory cells beneath which lie several layers of palisade-like parenchymatous cells, some of which contain raphides or mucilage. The secretory cells are collenchymatous and their walls have numerous pits with associated plasmodesmata. They contain the full complement of organelles characteristic of secretory cells as well as intravacuolar protein bodies but some of the secretory epidermal cells, following secretion, collapse and their anticlinal walls seem to fold. Nectar secretion is thought to be granulocrine and, following starch depletion, lipid droplets collect within the plastids. The nectar accumulates beneath the cuticle which subsequently forms swellings. Finally, nectar collects in the saccate nectary spur formed by the fusion of the margins of the labellum and the base of the column-foot. Thus, although the nectary of H. imbricata and M. coccinea have many features in common, they nevertheless display a number of important differences.
尽管人们认为有多种兰花是由蜂鸟授粉的,但我们对这些兰花蜜腺的了解仅基于一个物种,即朱红密花兰(Maxillaria coccinea (Jacq.) L.O. Williams ex Hodge)。然而,据推测,此类蜜腺可能具有很大的多样性,本文旨在比较瓣蕊兰(Hexisea imbricata (Lindl.) Rchb.f.)与朱红密花兰的蜜腺及花蜜分泌过程,以便初步描述新热带地区假定的鸟媒传粉兰花的蜜腺特征。
利用光学显微镜、透射电子显微镜和组织化学方法研究了瓣蕊兰蜜腺组织的组织学、化学成分及花蜜分泌过程。
瓣蕊兰的蜜腺有维管束供应,由单层表皮包围,气孔较少,包含两到三层表皮下分泌细胞,其下方有几层栅栏状薄壁细胞,其中一些含有针晶或黏液。分泌细胞为厚角组织,其细胞壁有许多具胞间连丝的纹孔。它们含有分泌细胞特有的全套细胞器以及液泡内蛋白质体,但一些分泌表皮细胞在分泌后会塌陷,其垂周壁似乎会折叠。花蜜分泌被认为是颗粒分泌型,淀粉耗尽后,质体内会积累脂滴。花蜜在角质层下积累,随后角质层形成肿胀。最后,花蜜聚集在由唇瓣边缘和蕊柱足基部融合形成的囊状蜜腺距中。因此,尽管瓣蕊兰和朱红密花兰的蜜腺有许多共同特征,但它们也存在一些重要差异。