Suppr超能文献

易激惹-敌意性抑郁:作为双相抑郁混合状态的进一步验证

Irritable-hostile depression: further validation as a bipolar depressive mixed state.

作者信息

Benazzi Franco, Akiskal Hagop

机构信息

E. Hecker Outpatient Psychiatry Center, Ravenna, Italy; Department of Psychiatry, National Health Service, Forli, Italy.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2005 Feb;84(2-3):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.07.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

"Hostile depression" has unofficially long been described as a depressive subtype, but since DSM-III, the affect has been made a defining characteristic of borderline personality disorder. The related affect of irritability in DSM-IV-TR subsumes various hostile nuances and is included in the stem question for mood disorders--especially for hypomanic episodes; in children, it is nonetheless a sign of depression. Then, there is the unofficial more general concept of depression with anger attacks, until recently ostensibly a "unipolar" (UP) disorder. A veritable tower of Babel indeed. In the present analyses, our aim was to extend previous research on irritable-hostile depression to more specific parameters of bipolarity and depressive mixed state (DMX).

METHODS

Consecutive 348 bipolar-II (BP-II) and 254 unipolar (UP) major depressive disorder (MDD) outpatients (off psychoactive agents, including substances of abuse), were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Hypomania Interview Guide, and the Family History Screen. Borderline personality, a confounding variable, rare in the FB setting, was excluded. Irritability was defined according to DSM-IV-TR, which includes various features of hostility and anger. Depressive mixed state (DMX) was defined as a major depressive episode (MDE) plus three or more concurrent intradepressive hypomanic symptoms, whether it occurred in BP-II or MDD.

RESULTS

MDE with irritability was present in 59.7% (208/348) of BP-II and in 37.4% (95/254) of MDD (p=0.0000). In BP-II, MDE with, versus MDE without, irritability had significantly younger index age, higher rates of axis I comorbidity, atypical depressive features, and DMX. Upon logistic regression, we found a significant independent association between BP-II MDE with irritability and DMX. In UP, MDE with, versus without, irritability had significantly younger age and age at onset, higher rates of atypical depression, DMX, and bipolar family history. Logistic regression revealed a significant independent association between MDE with irritability and DMX. Given that we had excluded patients with borderline personality, the high prevalence of irritable-hostile depressives in this outpatient population means that hostility cannot be considered the signature of that personality. Factor analysis revealed independent "psychomotor activation" and "irritability-mental activation" factors. Odds ratios of irritability for DMX were highest in the "UP" MDD group (=12.2); for predicting DMX, irritability had the best psychometric profile of sensitivity of 66.3% and a specificity of 86.1% for this group as well.

LIMITATION

We did not use specific instruments to measure irritable, hostile, and angry affects.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses show that irritable-hostile depression is distinct from agitated depression. Whether arising from a BP-II or MDD baseline, irritable-hostile depression emerges as a valid entity with strong links to external bipolar validators, such as bipolar family history. Irritable-hostile phenomenology in depression appears to be a strong clinical marker for a DMX. Irritable-hostile depression as a variant of DMX deserves the benefit of what seems to work best in practice, i.e., anticonvulsant mood stabilizers and/or atypical antipsychotics. Formal treatment studies are very much needed.

摘要

背景

“敌对性抑郁”长期以来一直被非正式地描述为一种抑郁亚型,但自《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)以来,这种情感已成为边缘性人格障碍的一个决定性特征。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM - IV - TR)中相关的易激惹情感包含了各种敌对的细微差别,并被纳入心境障碍的起始问题中——尤其是对于轻躁狂发作;在儿童中,它仍是抑郁的一个迹象。此外,还有非官方的更普遍的伴有愤怒发作的抑郁概念,直到最近表面上还是一种“单相”(UP)障碍。这确实是一座名副其实的巴别塔。在本分析中,我们的目的是将先前关于易激惹 - 敌对性抑郁的研究扩展到双相性和抑郁混合状态(DMX)的更具体参数。

方法

对348例双相II型(BP - II)和254例单相(UP)重度抑郁症(MDD)门诊患者(停用精神活性药物,包括滥用物质)进行连续访谈,采用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版的结构化临床访谈、轻躁狂访谈指南和家族史筛查。边缘性人格作为一个混杂变量,在本研究环境中罕见,被排除在外。易激惹根据DSM - IV - TR进行定义,其中包括敌意和愤怒的各种特征。抑郁混合状态(DMX)被定义为一次重度抑郁发作(MDE)加上三个或更多同时出现的抑郁期内轻躁狂症状,无论其发生在BP - II还是MDD中。

结果

BP - II患者中59.7%(208/348)存在伴有易激惹的MDE,MDD患者中37.4%(95/254)存在伴有易激惹的MDE(p = 0.0000)。在BP - II中,伴有易激惹的MDE与不伴有易激惹的MDE相比,发病年龄显著更小,轴I共病率更高,具有非典型抑郁特征和DMX。经逻辑回归分析,我们发现BP - II中伴有易激惹的MDE与DMX之间存在显著的独立关联。在UP中,伴有易激惹的MDE与不伴有易激惹的MDE相比,年龄和发病年龄显著更小,非典型抑郁症、DMX和双相家族史的发生率更高。逻辑回归显示伴有易激惹的MDE与DMX之间存在显著的独立关联。鉴于我们已排除边缘性人格患者,该门诊人群中易激惹 - 敌对性抑郁的高患病率意味着敌意不能被视为该人格的特征。因子分析揭示了独立的“精神运动性激活”和“易激惹 - 精神激活”因子。DMX的易激惹优势比在“UP”MDD组中最高(= 12.2);对于预测DMX,易激惹在该组中具有最佳的心理测量特征,敏感性为66.3%,特异性为86.1%。

局限性

我们未使用特定工具来测量易激惹、敌对和愤怒情感。

结论

这些分析表明,易激惹 - 敌对性抑郁与激越性抑郁不同。无论源于BP - II还是MDD基线,易激惹 - 敌对性抑郁都表现为一个有效的实体,与外部双相验证指标如双相家族史有很强的联系。抑郁症中的易激惹 - 敌对现象似乎是DMX的一个强有力的临床标志物。作为DMX变体的易激惹 - 敌对性抑郁值得采用在实践中似乎最有效的治疗方法,即抗惊厥心境稳定剂和/或非典型抗精神病药物。非常需要进行正式的治疗研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验