Suppr超能文献

通过同行评审确定有需求的非专科医生的教育干预措施,以改善其实践水平。

Educational interventions to improve practice of nonspecialty physicians who are identified in need by peer review.

作者信息

Norton Peter G, Ginsburg Liane Soberman, Dunn Earl, Beckett Roy, Faulkner Daniel

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.

出版信息

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004 Fall;24(4):244-52. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340240408.

Abstract

This article reports on the peer review process of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the licensing and regulatory authority, and the effect of educational interventions on physicians identified to be in need. Since 1980, the college has assessed more than 175 random and targeted nonspecialist physicians each year. A structured remediation process has been employed for those in need. Extensive data files have been maintained by the college. A majority of physicians identified as needing improvement improved and maintained their improved performance. The simple structured interventions employed by the college demonstrate an educational intervention that produces practice improvement.

摘要

本文报道了安大略省内科医生与外科医生学院(该省的许可和监管机构)的同行评审过程,以及教育干预措施对那些被认定有需求的医生所产生的影响。自1980年以来,该学院每年评估175多名随机抽取和有针对性选取的非专科医生。对于有需求的医生采用了结构化的补救程序。该学院维护了大量的数据文件。大多数被认定需要改进的医生确实取得了进步,并保持了改进后的表现。该学院采用的简单结构化干预措施证明了一种能带来实践改进的教育干预方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验