• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对非病毒性传播感染的性伴侣管理的看法。

Physicians' opinions on partner management for nonviral sexually transmitted infections.

作者信息

Niccolai Linda M, Winston Diana M

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2):229-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.009.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.009
PMID:15710281
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-delivered therapy (PDT) for nonviral sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is the practice of dispensing or prescribing medication to patients for their sex partners. While this practice is effective in preventing re-infection in patients, its use is not widespread. The purpose of this survey was to assess physicians' PDT practices and opinions toward potential benefits and perceived barriers associated with PDT.

METHODS

During 2003 and 2004, a random sample of family and general practitioners, internists, emergency medicine physicians, and obstetricians/gynecologists in Connecticut and Rhode Island were mailed surveys and responses were analyzed.

RESULTS

A response rate of 53% was obtained. Approximately 50% of 111 respondents reported having ever used PDT, although a much smaller proportion (6%) reported using it frequently. Potential benefits cited by many physicians included preventing the spread of STI (83%), reinforcing need for partner treatment (78%), and prevention of re-infection in the patient (63%). However, many perceived barriers were also noted, including difficulty ensuring delivery of medication to the partner (96%), concern about adverse reactions in partners (88%), liability (75%), and missed opportunities for other clinical services (68%). Half of all respondents said that they would support legislation to authorize PDT.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PDT is not widespread; physicians recognize the benefits of PDT but many concerns were also noted. A growing body of research indicates that several perceived barriers may be largely unsubstantiated. Therefore, dispelling physician concerns and defining the legal environment surrounding PDT might encourage physicians to use PDT when it is clinically indicated, thereby preventing re-infection in patients and further spread in the community.

摘要

背景

针对非病毒性传播感染(STIs)的患者自我给药疗法(PDT)是指为患者的性伴侣分发或开处药物的做法。虽然这种做法在预防患者再次感染方面有效,但其应用并不广泛。本次调查的目的是评估医生的PDT做法以及他们对PDT潜在益处和感知障碍的看法。

方法

在2003年和2004年期间,对康涅狄格州和罗德岛的家庭医生、全科医生、内科医生、急诊医生以及妇产科医生进行随机抽样并邮寄调查问卷,然后对回复进行分析。

结果

获得了53%的回复率。111名受访者中约50%报告曾使用过PDT,不过报告经常使用的比例要小得多(6%)。许多医生提到的潜在益处包括预防性传播感染的传播(83%)、强化伴侣治疗的必要性(78%)以及预防患者再次感染(63%)。然而,也注意到许多感知到的障碍,包括难以确保药物送达伴侣(96%)、担心伴侣出现不良反应(88%)、责任问题(75%)以及错过其他临床服务机会(68%)。所有受访者中有一半表示他们会支持授权PDT的立法。

结论

PDT的使用并不广泛;医生认识到PDT的益处,但也注意到许多问题。越来越多的研究表明,一些感知到的障碍可能在很大程度上没有事实依据。因此,消除医生的顾虑并明确围绕PDT的法律环境可能会鼓励医生在临床有指征时使用PDT,从而预防患者再次感染以及在社区中的进一步传播。

相似文献

1
Physicians' opinions on partner management for nonviral sexually transmitted infections.医生对非病毒性传播感染的性伴侣管理的看法。
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2):229-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.009.
2
Patient-delivered partner therapy for chlamydial infections: attitudes and practices of California physicians and nurse practitioners.患者主导的性伴治疗衣原体感染:加利福尼亚州医生和执业护士的态度与做法
Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jul;33(7):458-63. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000219865.65253.29.
3
Primary care physicians' perceptions of adolescent pregnancy and STD prevention practices in a Nova Scotia county.新斯科舍省一个县的初级保健医生对青少年怀孕和性传播疾病预防措施的看法。
Am J Prev Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;13(4):324-30.
4
Obstetrician-gynecologists' opinions about patient safety: costs and liability remain problems; are mandated reports a solution?妇产科医生对患者安全的看法:成本和责任仍是问题;强制报告是解决办法吗?
Womens Health Issues. 2009 Jan-Feb;19(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.07.012. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
5
Physician-identified barriers to intimate partner violence screening.医生确定的亲密伴侣暴力筛查障碍。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Oct;14(8):713-20. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.713.
6
Hormone replacement therapy: a survey of Ontario physicians' prescribing practices.激素替代疗法:安大略省医生处方实践调查。
CMAJ. 1999 Sep 21;161(6):695-8.
7
Factors inhibiting use of the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine: a survey of Connecticut physicians.肺炎球菌多糖疫苗使用的阻碍因素:康涅狄格州医生的一项调查
Conn Med. 1998 Nov;62(11):649-54.
8
Providers' perceived barriers to sexually transmitted disease care in 2 large health maintenance organizations.在两家大型健康维护组织中,医疗服务提供者对性传播疾病护理的认知障碍。
Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Feb;35(2):184-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815a9f7e.
9
Patterns and determinants of patient-delivered therapy uptake among healthcare consumers.医疗保健消费者中患者自主治疗采用情况的模式与决定因素。
Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Jan;36(1):25-32. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318186011d.
10
Factors associated with open practices: results from the Canadian National Family Physician Survey.与开放医疗行为相关的因素:来自加拿大国家家庭医生调查的结果。
Can Fam Physician. 2006 Jan;52(1):66-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Mixed-methods Evaluation of an Expedited Partner Therapy Take-home Medication Program: Pilot Emergency Department Intervention to Improve Sexual Health Equity.混合方法评价快速伴侣治疗带药回家方案:改善性健康公平的试点急诊干预。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;24(5):993-1004. doi: 10.5811/westjem.59506.
2
Recommendations for Providing Quality Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinical Services, 2020.2020 年提供优质性病临床服务的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Jan 3;68(5):1-20. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6805a1.
3
Potential for Point-of-Care Tests to Reduce Chlamydia-associated Burden in the United States: A Mathematical Modeling Analysis.
基于数学模型分析的美国即时检测在降低衣原体相关性疾病负担中的潜力
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 15;70(9):1816-1823. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz519.
4
Expedited partner therapy for sexually transmitted diseases: assessing the legal environment.性传播疾病的加速性伴侣治疗:评估法律环境。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Feb;98(2):238-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.113381. Epub 2008 Jan 2.