Rubin Michael A, Bateman Kim, Alder Stephen, Donnelly Sharon, Stoddard Gregory J, Samore Matthew H
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Feb 15;40(4):546-53. doi: 10.1086/427500. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
Antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) is widespread, is often inappropriate, and may contribute to antibiotic resistance among community-acquired pathogens, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae.
A multifaceted intervention involving health care professionals and patients was introduced to a small rural Utah community and included the repetitive use of printed diagnostic and treatment algorithms by professionals. Data on the quantity and class of antibiotic prescribing, which were collected from multiple sources, were measured for the intervention period (from January through June) in 2001 and compared with data for the baseline period during the same months in 2000.
Medicaid claims data revealed that the percentage of patients in the community who received antibiotics for URTIs during the intervention period was 15.6% less than that for the baseline period, whereas the percentage in the rest of rural Utah was relatively stable, with a 1.5% decrease (P=.006). The greatest impact of the intervention was on prescribing for acute bronchitis (decreases of 56.1% and 1.7% in the community and rural Utah, respectively; P=.024) and on prescribing of macrolides (decreases of 13.4% and 0.2% in the community and rural Utah, respectively; P<.001). Community pharmacy data likewise revealed a 17.5% decrease in the rate of antibiotic prescribing during the intervention period (P<.001), with the largest decrease observed for macrolide prescribing (50.9%; P<.001). Chart review data, in contrast, revealed no significant decrease in the percentage of patients with URTI who were prescribed an antibiotic (3.8%; P=.49), although there was a significant decrease of 11.2% in macrolide use (P=.045).
A multifaceted intervention involving the repetitive use of printed algorithms resulted in modest improvements in antibiotic prescribing for outpatient URTIs, although one data source did not corroborate this. However, macrolide prescribing decreased sharply, irrespective of the source of data.
上呼吸道感染(URTIs)的抗生素处方很普遍,且常常不合理,这可能会导致社区获得性病原体(如肺炎链球菌)产生抗生素耐药性。
在犹他州一个小型乡村社区引入了一项涉及医护人员和患者的多方面干预措施,其中包括专业人员重复使用印刷的诊断和治疗算法。从多个来源收集了抗生素处方数量和种类的数据,对2001年干预期间(1月至6月)的数据进行了测量,并与2000年同一月份的基线期数据进行了比较。
医疗补助报销数据显示,干预期间该社区因上呼吸道感染接受抗生素治疗的患者百分比比基线期低15.6%,而犹他州其他农村地区的百分比相对稳定,下降了1.5%(P = 0.006)。该干预措施的最大影响在于急性支气管炎的处方(该社区和犹他州农村地区分别下降了56.1%和1.7%;P = 0.024)以及大环内酯类药物的处方(该社区和犹他州农村地区分别下降了13.4%和0.2%;P < 0.001)。社区药房数据同样显示,干预期间抗生素处方率下降了17.5%(P < 0.001),其中大环内酯类药物处方下降幅度最大(50.9%;P < 0.001)。相比之下,病历审查数据显示,开具抗生素的上呼吸道感染患者百分比没有显著下降(3.8%;P = 0.49),尽管大环内酯类药物的使用显著下降了11.2%(P = 0.045)。
一项涉及重复使用印刷算法的多方面干预措施,使门诊上呼吸道感染的抗生素处方情况有了适度改善,尽管有一个数据源并未证实这一点。然而,无论数据来源如何,大环内酯类药物的处方都大幅下降。