el-Ghoul W
Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2005 Jan;112(1):3-10.
The study was carried out on 40 apparently clinical healthy dogs classified into 5 groups of 8 dogs each. Adhesion was experimentally induced by transsection and reanastomosis of jejunum. In the control group the site of anastomosis and abdominal cavity was lavaged with 250 ml saline solution. In group two lavage was done with 250 ml of a liquid barrier composed of a combination of high molecular weight solution (1% sodium carboxymethylcellulose) as a carrier, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (Piroxecam), broad spectrum antibiotic (Cephalosporin), anticoagulant (Heparin) and antioxidant (0.5% methylene blue). In group three the anastomosis site was covered with a sodium hyalouronate/carboxymethylcellulose bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm). In group four a natural biocompatible collagen sheet (VET BIO SIS T) was applied on the anastomosis site. In group five the abdominal cavity was lavaged with 250 ml liquid barrier and the anastomosis site was covered by either Seprafilm membrane or VET BIO SIS T sheet. At the fourteen day after operation, adhesion was assessed by ultrasonography after instillation of 1000 ml of physiological saline solution into the abdominal cavity. The dogs were sacrificed and an autopsy examination was carried out with the attention to the number, density and site of the adhesion formation. The results revealed that all the control dogs and some dogs in the treatment groups had positive ultrasonographic findings. Transabdominal sonogram clearly showed echogenic bands floating in the abdominal cavity and echogenic masses in more serious subjects. Necropsy examination showed that all the control dogs had intra-abdominal adhesions (8 of 8 dogs) and treatment with liquid barrier (4 of 8 dogs), seprafilm membrane barrier (3 of 8 dogs), VET BIO SIS T sheet barrier (4 of 8 dogs) and combination of fluid and membrane barrier groups (4 of 8 dogs) significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the incidence of adhesion formation. The adhesion severity in the four treated groups was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased compared with the control group as shown by both ultrasonography and necropsy examination scores. In conclusion the suggested hypothesis is more or less positive and the combined liquid and membrane barriers might be an effective way to decrease intra-abdominal adhesion formation, and the ultrasonography is a useful tool to diagnose intra-abdominal adhesion, and their applications might be valuable to the clinical settings.
该研究对40只表面临床健康的犬进行,将其分为5组,每组8只。通过空肠横断和再吻合术实验性诱导粘连形成。对照组中,吻合部位和腹腔用250毫升盐溶液冲洗。在第二组中,用250毫升由高分子量溶液(1%羧甲基纤维素钠)作为载体、非甾体抗炎药(吡罗昔康)、广谱抗生素(头孢菌素)、抗凝剂(肝素)和抗氧化剂(0.5%亚甲蓝)组合而成的液体屏障进行冲洗。在第三组中,吻合部位覆盖透明质酸钠/羧甲基纤维素生物可吸收膜(Seprafilm)。在第四组中,在吻合部位应用天然生物相容性胶原片(VET BIO SIS T)。在第五组中,腹腔用250毫升液体屏障冲洗,吻合部位用Seprafilm膜或VET BIO SIS T片覆盖。术后第14天,向腹腔内注入1000毫升生理盐水后,通过超声检查评估粘连情况。处死犬后进行尸检,重点关注粘连形成的数量、密度和部位。结果显示,所有对照犬以及治疗组中的一些犬超声检查结果呈阳性。经腹超声图清楚显示腹腔内有回声带漂浮,病情较重的犬有回声团块。尸检显示,所有对照犬均有腹腔内粘连(8只犬中的8只),而用液体屏障治疗(8只犬中的4只)、Seprafilm膜屏障治疗(8只犬中的3只)、VET BIO SIS T片屏障治疗(8只犬中的4只)以及液体和膜屏障联合治疗组(8只犬中的4只)均显著(p<0.05)降低了粘连形成的发生率。超声检查和尸检评分均显示,与对照组相比,四个治疗组的粘连严重程度均显著(p<0.05)降低。总之,所提出的假设或多或少是肯定的,液体和膜联合屏障可能是减少腹腔内粘连形成的有效方法,超声检查是诊断腹腔内粘连的有用工具,它们的应用可能对临床环境有价值。