Suppr超能文献

扫视性头部运动不存在与扫视相关的空间和时间误差。

Saccade-contingent spatial and temporal errors are absent for saccadic head movements.

作者信息

Jackson Stephen R, Newport Roger, Osborne Faye, Wakely Rosie, Smith Daniel, Walsh Vincent

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Nottingham.

出版信息

Cortex. 2005 Apr;41(2):205-12. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70895-5.

Abstract

Psychophysical studies extending over a thirty-year period have repeatedly demonstrated that visual stimuli presented close to the onset of a saccadic eye movement are mislocalised both spatially and temporally. When post-saccadic visual references are available, this spatial distortion is best characterised by a compression of visual space toward the target of the saccadic eye movement. An important but unresolved issue, concerns the specificity of saccade-dependent visual mislocalisation phenomena. We investigated this by examining whether saccade-dependent spatial and temporal mislocalisation are observed in an individual (A.I.) who cannot make any form of eye movement (opthalamoplegia), but compensates when reading or scanning visual scenes by making saccadic head movements. We demonstrate that saccade-dependent spatial and temporal mislocalisation are absent in subject A.I. and suggest that spatiotemporal mislocalisation may be specific to rapid forms of movement, such as ocular saccades, that necessitate predictive re-mapping to maintain space constancy.

摘要

一项持续了三十年的心理物理学研究反复表明,在扫视眼动开始时附近呈现的视觉刺激在空间和时间上都会被错误定位。当扫视后的视觉参考可用时,这种空间扭曲的最佳特征是视觉空间向扫视眼动目标的压缩。一个重要但尚未解决的问题是,与扫视相关的视觉错误定位现象的特异性。我们通过研究在一个无法进行任何形式眼动(眼球麻痹)但在阅读或扫描视觉场景时通过进行扫视头部运动来进行补偿的个体(A.I.)中是否观察到与扫视相关的空间和时间错误定位来对此进行了调查。我们证明个体A.I.不存在与扫视相关的空间和时间错误定位,并表明时空错误定位可能特定于快速的运动形式,如眼球扫视,这种运动需要预测性重新映射以维持空间恒常性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验