Siddiqui R A, Kochhar R, Singh V, Rajwanshi A, Goenka M K, Mehta S K
Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1992 Mar-Apr;7(2):161-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1992.tb00955.x.
The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of fibronectin, a glycoprotein, for the diagnosis of malignant ascites and to compare it with conventional parameters. Ascitic fluid samples from 50 patients, 25 with intra-abdominal malignancy and 25 without it were analysed for total protein concentration, fluid/serum protein ratio, glucose concentration, leucocyte count, pH, fibronectin concentration (by ELISA) and for malignant cell cytology. Twenty-two of the 25 patients with ascites and intra-abdominal malignancy had documented peritoneal metastases in group A. The 25 patients with non-malignant ascites constituted group B. Mean values of ascitic fluid fibronectin, for groups A and B were 538 +/- 46 micrograms/mL and 60 +/- 4.92 micrograms/mL, respectively (P less than 0.001). Within the group with malignant ascites, patients who had positive malignant cytology (n = 12) exhibited a significantly higher ascitic fluid fibronectin concentration than patients with negative cytology (P less than 0.05). While mean ascitic fluid protein concentration showed a significant difference (P less than 0.01) between the two groups, there was no difference in respect to ascitic fluid pH, glucose concentration and leucocyte count. Malignant cell cytology was positive in 54.5% of group A patients with no false positive report in group B. The diagnostic accuracy for differentiating malignant from non-malignant ascites was 100% for a fibronectin value of greater than or equal to 110 micrograms/mL as compared with 78.7% for ascitic fluid protein concentration greater than or equal to 0.5 g/dL, 57.4% for leucocyte count greater than or equal to 1000/mm3, 59.6% for pH less than 7.45 and 78.7% for malignant cell cytology.
本研究的目的是评估糖蛋白纤连蛋白对恶性腹水诊断的准确性,并将其与传统参数进行比较。对50例患者的腹水样本进行分析,其中25例患有腹腔内恶性肿瘤,25例没有,分析指标包括总蛋白浓度、腹水/血清蛋白比值、葡萄糖浓度、白细胞计数、pH值、纤连蛋白浓度(采用酶联免疫吸附测定法)以及恶性细胞细胞学检查。A组中25例患有腹水和腹腔内恶性肿瘤的患者中有22例记录有腹膜转移。25例非恶性腹水患者构成B组。A组和B组腹水纤连蛋白的平均值分别为538±46微克/毫升和60±4.92微克/毫升(P<0.001)。在恶性腹水组中,恶性细胞学检查呈阳性的患者(n=12)腹水纤连蛋白浓度显著高于细胞学检查呈阴性的患者(P<0.05)。虽然两组之间腹水蛋白平均浓度存在显著差异(P<0.01),但在腹水pH值、葡萄糖浓度和白细胞计数方面没有差异。A组54.5%的患者恶性细胞细胞学检查呈阳性,B组无假阳性报告。与腹水蛋白浓度≥0.5克/分升时的诊断准确率78.7%、白细胞计数≥1000/mm³时的57.4%、pH值<7.45时的59.6%以及恶性细胞细胞学检查时的78.7%相比,纤连蛋白值≥110微克/毫升时鉴别恶性与非恶性腹水的诊断准确率为100%。