• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品药品监督管理局:药物研发与审批的证据标准

FDA: evidentiary standards for drug development and approval.

作者信息

Katz Russell

机构信息

Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products, United States Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA.

出版信息

NeuroRx. 2004 Jul;1(3):307-16. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.1.3.307.

DOI:10.1602/neurorx.1.3.307
PMID:15717032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC534930/
Abstract

The United States Food and Drug Administration is charged with approving drug treatments that have been shown to be safe and effective. Relevant statutes and regulations provide a legal framework for establishing safety and effectiveness that is sufficiently flexible to ensure that appropriate scientific data are collected for specific treatments targeted to particular diseases. Nonetheless, all clinical trials proposed to establish effectiveness must incorporate common elements in order for the appropriate legal and scientific standards of drug approval to be met. This article will discuss the relevant laws and regulations pertaining to the current effectiveness standard and will discuss the most important clinical trial design elements currently considered acceptable for applications for treatments of neurologic and psychiatric illness.

摘要

美国食品药品监督管理局负责批准已证明安全有效的药物治疗方法。相关法规提供了一个建立安全性和有效性的法律框架,该框架具有足够的灵活性,以确保针对特定疾病的特定治疗方法收集到适当的科学数据。尽管如此,所有为证明有效性而提议进行的临床试验都必须包含共同要素,以便符合药物批准的适当法律和科学标准。本文将讨论与当前有效性标准相关的法律法规,并讨论目前被认为适用于神经和精神疾病治疗申请的最重要的临床试验设计要素。

相似文献

1
FDA: evidentiary standards for drug development and approval.美国食品药品监督管理局:药物研发与审批的证据标准
NeuroRx. 2004 Jul;1(3):307-16. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.1.3.307.
2
Association of the FDA Amendment Act with trial registration, publication, and outcome reporting.《美国食品药品监督管理局修正案法案》与试验注册、发表及结果报告的关联
Trials. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2068-3.
3
FDA's proposed regulations to expand access to investigational drugs for treatment use: the status quo in the guise of reform.美国食品药品监督管理局扩大治疗用研究性药物可及性的拟议法规:打着改革幌子的现状。
Food Drug Law J. 2009;64(1):183-223.
4
New clinical trials policy at FDA.美国食品药品监督管理局的新临床试验政策。
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;24(9):1043. doi: 10.1038/nbt0906-1043. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
5
FDA given new powers over data reporting to national clinical trials registry.美国食品药品监督管理局在向国家临床试验注册机构的数据报告方面获得了新权力。
BMJ. 2012 Oct 2;345:e6629. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6629.
6
The role of the fDA in cancer clinical trials.美国食品药品监督管理局在癌症临床试验中的作用。
Cancer Treat Res. 2007;132:51-109. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-33225-3_4.
7
Relocating abroad. FDA sends staff overseas to help monitor imports.迁往国外。美国食品药品监督管理局派遣工作人员到海外协助监管进口产品。
Mod Healthc. 2011 Oct 24;41(43):32.
8
The FDA Amendments Act of 2007 - Assessing Its Effects a Decade Later.《2007年美国食品药品监督管理局修正案法案》——十年后评估其影响
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1097-1099. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1803910.
9
Transforming Drug Development in Heart Failure: Navigating the Regulatory Crossroads.心力衰竭药物研发的变革:穿越监管十字路口
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Oct;9(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003192.
10
Cautious welcome for FDA pharmacogenomics guidance.对美国食品药品监督管理局药物基因组学指南表示谨慎欢迎。
Nat Biotechnol. 2005 May;23(5):510. doi: 10.1038/nbt0505-510.

引用本文的文献

1
Current landscape of innovative drug development and regulatory support in China.中国创新药物研发与监管支持的现状
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025 Jul 22;10(1):220. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02267-y.
2
Results From a Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of ANX005, a C1q Inhibitor, in Patients With Guillain-Barré Syndrome.一项1期研究的结果,该研究评估C1q抑制剂ANX005在吉兰-巴雷综合征患者中的安全性、耐受性、药代动力学、药效学和疗效。
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2025 Mar;30(1):e70009. doi: 10.1111/jns.70009.
3
World-wide variations in tests of cognition and activities of daily living in participants of six international randomized controlled trials.六项国际随机对照试验参与者认知测试和日常生活活动的全球差异。
Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2023 Jul 6;5:100176. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2023.100176. eCollection 2023.
4
Analysis of Supportive Evidence for US Food and Drug Administration Approvals of Novel Drugs in 2020.2020 年美国食品和药物管理局批准新药的支持性证据分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212454. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12454.
5
Kratom Abuse Potential 2021: An Updated Eight Factor Analysis.2021年 kratom 的滥用可能性:最新的八因素分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 28;12:775073. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.775073. eCollection 2021.
6
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy: Updated comparisons and meta-analyses of newer versus older trials.选择性发布抗抑郁药试验及其对明显疗效的影响:更新的新试验与旧试验比较和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 19;19(1):e1003886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003886. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
Current standards and ethical landscape of engineered tissues-3D bioprinting perspective.工程组织的当前标准与伦理格局——3D生物打印视角
J Tissue Eng. 2021 Jul 29;12:20417314211027677. doi: 10.1177/20417314211027677. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Intense Arm Rehabilitation Therapy Improves the Modified Rankin Scale Score: Association Between Gains in Impairment and Function.强化手臂康复治疗可改善改良 Rankin 量表评分:功能改善与损伤程度变化的关联。
Neurology. 2021 Apr 6;96(14):e1812-e1822. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011667. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
9
The Utility of Domain-Specific End Points in Acute Stroke Trials.特定领域终点在急性脑卒中试验中的应用。
Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):1154-1161. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031939. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
10
Improving Interactions Between Health Technology Assessment Bodies and Regulatory Agencies: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Survey on Processes, Progress, Outcomes, and Challenges.改善卫生技术评估机构与监管机构之间的互动:关于流程、进展、成果和挑战的系统评价与横断面调查
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Oct 16;7:582634. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.582634. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.世界医学协会《赫尔辛基宣言》。涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则。
Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(4):373-4. Epub 2003 Jul 2.
2
Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments. Part 2: practical issues and specific cases.新疗法评估中的安慰剂对照试验和活性对照试验。第2部分:实际问题与具体案例。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Sep 19;133(6):464-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-6-200009190-00015.
3
Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments. Part 1: ethical and scientific issues.在新治疗方法评估中进行的安慰剂对照试验和活性对照试验。第1部分:伦理和科学问题。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Sep 19;133(6):455-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-6-200009190-00014.
4
Slowing the progression of Alzheimer disease: methodologic issues.延缓阿尔茨海默病的进展:方法学问题
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 Suppl 5:S10-21; discussion S37-9.
5
Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled?临床试验中的替代终点:我们是否被误导了?
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Oct 1;125(7):605-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-7-199610010-00011.
6
Hazards of inference: the active control investigation.推断的风险:活性对照研究
Epilepsia. 1989;30 Suppl 1:S57-63; discussion S64-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1989.tb05816.x.