Shimada Tsutomu, Nomura Masaaki, Yokogawa Koichi, Endo Yoshio, Sasaki Takuma, Miyamoto Ken-ichi, Yonemura Yutaka
Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Kanazawa University School of Medicine, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan.
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2005 Feb;57(2):177-81. doi: 10.1211/0022357055380.
Intraperitoneal administration of docetaxel has been used to treat peritoneal dissemination of cancer, but its safety has not yet been confirmed. We have compared the pharmacokinetic behaviour of docetaxel after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration in CD-1-nu/nu mice bearing MKN45P, a gastric cancer variant line producing peritoneal dissemination. Docetaxel (8 mg kg(-1)) was intravenously or intraperitoneally injected into the mice and at designated times the drug concentration was measured in plasma, ascites fluid, and abdominal tissues (liver, kidney, intestine and spleen, solid cancer, and suspended free cancer). The pharmacokinetic behaviour of docetaxel was similar in control mice and cancer-bearing mice after administration via either route, except that the transfer of docetaxel from the abdominal cavity to systemic blood (plasma) was slower in cancerbearing mice than in control mice. As expected, the intraperitoneal drug concentration was much higher (approximately 100-fold) and was maintained for a longer time in the intraperitoneal injection group than in the intravenous injection group. The drug concentrations in peritoneal solid cancer tissue and suspended free cancer cells were also significantly higher for a longer time in the intraperitoneal injection group than in the intravenous injection group. The values of the plasma area under concentration-time curves (AUC) were similar for both administration routes. The ratio of AUC ascite/AUC plasma after intraperitoneal administration was higher than after intravenous administration. The drug concentration in abdominal organs after intraperitoneal injection was lower during the first 2 h, then became similar to those after intravenous injection. These results indicated that the intraperitoneal administration of docetaxel for peritoneal dissemination was likely to be an effective treatment method, without causing any increase in systemic toxicity.
多西他赛腹腔内给药已被用于治疗癌症的腹膜播散,但其安全性尚未得到证实。我们比较了多西他赛在静脉注射和腹腔内注射后,在携带MKN45P(一种产生腹膜播散的胃癌变异株)的CD-1-nu/nu小鼠体内的药代动力学行为。将多西他赛(8 mg kg(-1))静脉或腹腔内注射到小鼠体内,并在指定时间测量血浆、腹水和腹部组织(肝脏、肾脏、肠道和脾脏、实体癌以及悬浮的游离癌细胞)中的药物浓度。无论通过哪种途径给药,多西他赛在对照小鼠和荷瘤小鼠中的药代动力学行为相似,只是多西他赛从腹腔向全身血液(血浆)的转运在荷瘤小鼠中比对照小鼠慢。正如预期的那样,腹腔内注射组的腹腔内药物浓度要高得多(约100倍),并且维持时间比静脉注射组更长。腹腔内注射组腹膜实体癌组织和悬浮游离癌细胞中的药物浓度在较长时间内也明显高于静脉注射组。两种给药途径的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)值相似。腹腔内给药后腹水AUC与血浆AUC的比值高于静脉给药后。腹腔内注射后腹部器官中的药物浓度在前2小时较低,然后变得与静脉注射后相似。这些结果表明,腹腔内给予多西他赛治疗腹膜播散可能是一种有效的治疗方法,且不会导致全身毒性增加。