人类运动皮层的短程训练、单相和双相重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)之间的比较。
Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.
作者信息
Arai Noritoshi, Okabe Shingo, Furubayashi Toshiaki, Terao Yasuo, Yuasa Kaoru, Ugawa Yoshikazu
机构信息
Department of Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
出版信息
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;116(3):605-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.020. Epub 2004 Nov 5.
OBJECTIVE
To compare motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by short train, monophasic, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations (rTMS) with those by short train, biphasic rTMS.
METHODS
Subjects were 13 healthy volunteers. Surface electromyographic (EMG) responses were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) in several different stimulation conditions. We gave both monophasic and biphasic rTMS over the motor cortex at a frequency of 0.5, 1, 2 or 3Hz. To study excitability changes of the spinal cord, we also performed 3Hz rTMS at the foramen magnum level [Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I. Magnetic stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the foramen magnum level in humans. Ann Neurol 1994;36:618-24]. We measured the size and latency of each of 20 MEPs recorded in the different stimulation conditions.
RESULTS
2 or 3Hz stimulation with either monophasic or biphasic pulses evoked MEPs that gradually increased in amplitude with the later MEPs being significantly larger than the earlier ones. Monophasic rTMS showed much more facilitation than biphasic stimulation, particularly at 3Hz. Stimulation at the foramen magnum level at 3Hz elicited fairly constant MEPs.
CONCLUSIONS
The enhancement of cortical MEPs with no changes of responses to foramen magnum level stimulation suggests that the facilitation occurred at the motor cortex. We hypothesize that monophasic TMS has a stronger short-term effect during repetitive stimulation than biphasic TMS because monophasic pulses preferentially activate one population of neurons oriented in the same direction so that their effects readily summate. Biphasic pulses in contrast may activate several different populations of neurons (both facilitatory and inhibitory) so that summation of the effects is not so clear as with monophasic pulses. When single stimuli are applied, however, biphasic TMS is thought to be more powerful than monophasic TMS because the peak-to-peak amplitude of stimulus pulse is higher and its duration is longer when the same intensity of stimulation (the same amount of current is stored by the stimulator) is used.
SIGNIFICANCE
This means that when using rTMS as a therapeutic tool or in research fields, the difference in waveforms of magnetic pulses (monophasic or biphasic) may affect the results.
目的
比较短串、单相、重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)与短串、双相rTMS诱发的运动诱发电位(MEP)。
方法
受试者为13名健康志愿者。在几种不同刺激条件下,记录右侧第一背侧骨间肌(FDI)的表面肌电图(EMG)反应。我们以0.5、1、2或3Hz的频率在运动皮层上施加单相和双相rTMS。为研究脊髓兴奋性变化,我们还在枕骨大孔水平进行3Hz rTMS[Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I. Magnetic stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the foramen magnum level in humans. Ann Neurol 1994;36:618 - 24]。我们测量了在不同刺激条件下记录的20个MEP中每个MEP的大小和潜伏期。
结果
单相或双相脉冲以2或3Hz刺激诱发的MEP,其振幅逐渐增加,后期的MEP明显大于早期的MEP。单相rTMS比双相刺激表现出更多的易化作用,尤其是在3Hz时。在枕骨大孔水平以3Hz刺激诱发的MEP相当恒定。
结论
皮层MEP增强而枕骨大孔水平刺激反应无变化,提示易化作用发生在运动皮层。我们推测,在重复刺激期间,单相TMS比双相TMS具有更强的短期效应,因为单相脉冲优先激活沿同一方向排列的一群神经元,从而使它们的效应易于总和。相比之下,双相脉冲可能激活几个不同的神经元群体(包括易化性和抑制性),因此效应总和不如单相脉冲明显。然而,当施加单个刺激时,双相TMS被认为比单相TMS更强大,因为在使用相同强度刺激(刺激器存储相同电量的电流)时,刺激脉冲的峰峰值振幅更高且持续时间更长。
意义
这意味着当将rTMS用作治疗工具或在研究领域中使用时,磁脉冲波形(单相或双相)的差异可能会影响结果。