Tranel Daniel, Martin Coleman, Damasio Hanna, Grabowski Thomas J, Hichwa Richard
Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, USA.
Brain Lang. 2005 Mar;92(3):288-99. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.01.011.
The neural correlates of naming concrete entities such as tools (with nouns) and naming actions (with verbs) are partially distinct: the former are linked to the left inferotemporal (IT) region, whereas the latter are linked to the left frontal opercular (FO) and left posterior middle temporal (MT) regions. This raises an intriguing question: How would such neural patterns be influenced by noun-verb homonymy, specifically, naming tasks in which the target words denote objects or actions (e.g., "comb")? To explore this, we conducted a PET study in which 10 normal participants named visually presented tools or actions. The factor of homonymy yielded interesting effects: For tools, non-homonymous nouns (e.g., "camera") activated left IT, whereas homonymous nouns (e.g., "comb") activated both left IT and left FO. For actions, non-homonymous (e.g., "juggle") and homonymous (e.g., "comb") verbs activated left FO, MT, and IT, but there was evidence that the FO and MT activations were less widespread for the homonymous verbs. We also found that retrieval of the same exact words (e.g., "comb" and "comb") produced differential activation in left MT-there was greater MT activation when the words were being used to name actions, than when they were being used to name tools. Our results suggest that noun-verb homonymy has an important influence on the patterns of neural activation associated with words denoting objects and actions, and that even when the phonological forms are identical, the patterns of neural activation are different according to the demands of the task.
命名具体实体(如工具,用名词)和命名动作(用动词)的神经关联部分是不同的:前者与左颞下回(IT)区域相关,而后者与左额盖(FO)和左颞中回后部(MT)区域相关。这就引出了一个有趣的问题:这种神经模式会如何受到名词 - 动词同音异义现象的影响,具体来说,就是目标词表示物体或动作的命名任务(如“comb”)?为了探究这一点,我们进行了一项正电子发射断层扫描(PET)研究,10名正常参与者对视觉呈现的工具或动作进行命名。同音异义因素产生了有趣的效应:对于工具,非同音异义名词(如“camera”)激活左IT,而同音异义名词(如“comb”)激活左IT和左FO。对于动作,非同音异义(如“juggle”)和同音异义(如“comb”)动词激活左FO、MT和IT,但有证据表明,同音异义动词的FO和MT激活范围较小。我们还发现,检索相同的词(如“comb”和“comb”)在左MT产生了不同的激活——当这些词用于命名动作时,MT的激活比用于命名工具时更强。我们的结果表明,名词 - 动词同音异义现象对与表示物体和动作的词相关的神经激活模式有重要影响,并且即使语音形式相同,神经激活模式也会根据任务需求而有所不同。