• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals.眼科期刊上发表的诊断准确性研究的报告质量。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;89(3):261-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.051862.
2
The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using the Heidelberg retina tomograph.使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪对青光眼诊断准确性研究的报告质量
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;47(6):2317-23. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1250.
3
Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.生殖医学中检验准确性研究的报告质量：诊断准确性报告标准（STARD）倡议的影响
Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.050. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
4
The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?自《STARD声明》发布以来诊断准确性研究的质量：有提高吗？
Neurology. 2006 Sep 12;67(5):792-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238386.41398.30.
5
Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals.临床眼科期刊中随机对照试验关键方法学项目的报告质量
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):390-8. doi: 10.1080/09286580701344399.
6
Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.诊断准确性研究的报告质量。
Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):347-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352040507. Epub 2005 Mar 15.
7
Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.STARD 清单的可重复性：一种评估诊断准确性研究报告质量的工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Mar 15;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-12.
8
Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?胃肠道期刊内镜诊断研究的质量报告：我们在 STARD 和 CONSORT 声明的使用方面处于什么位置？
Endoscopy. 2010 Feb;42(2):138-47. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243846. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
9
Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.迈向完整、准确的诊断准确性研究报告。STARD倡议。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2003 Jan;119(1):18-22. doi: 10.1309/8EXC-CM6Y-R1TH-UBAF.
10
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.迈向诊断准确性研究的完整和准确报告：STARD倡议。诊断准确性报告标准小组。
Croat Med J. 2003 Oct;44(5):635-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Ultrasound Literature and Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Criteria.急诊超声文献与诊断准确性标准报告规范的遵循情况
J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;58(4):636-646. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.09.029. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
2
Assessment of Adherence of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Published in Radiology Journals to STARD Statement Indexed in Web of Science, PubMed & Scopus in 2015.2015年发表于放射学期刊且被科学引文索引、医学期刊数据库及Scopus数据库收录的诊断准确性研究对STARD声明的依从性评估
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2018 Sep 1;8(3):311-324. eCollection 2018 Sep.
3
Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.青光眼的诊断准确性研究报告仍不完整：应用 2015 年诊断准确性研究报告标准（STARD）。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0189716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189716. eCollection 2017.
4
Quality Assessment of Research Articles in Nuclear Medicine Using STARD and QUADAS-2 Tools.使用STARD和QUADAS-2工具对核医学研究文章进行质量评估
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol. 2014 Fall;2(2):120-6.
5
On-the-Job Evidence-Based Medicine Training for Clinician-Scientists of the Next Generation.为下一代临床科学家提供基于循证医学的在职培训。
Clin Biochem Rev. 2013 Aug;34(2):93-103.
6
Reporting characteristics of cancer pain: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals.癌症疼痛的报告特征：姑息治疗期刊中研究出版物的系统评价与定量分析
Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Jan;17(1):57-66. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.78451.
7
Cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma in developed countries.在发达国家，开角型青光眼筛查的成本效益。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;59 Suppl(Suppl1):S24-30. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.73684.
8
Quality and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in TB, HIV and malaria: evaluation using QUADAS and STARD standards.结核病、艾滋病和疟疾诊断准确性研究的质量和报告：使用 QUADAS 和 STARD 标准进行评估。
PLoS One. 2009 Nov 13;4(11):e7753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007753.
9
Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: no change since STARD statement publication--before-and-after study.诊断准确性研究报告的质量：自STARD声明发布以来无变化——前后对照研究
Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):817-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483072067.
10
EBM metadata based on Dublin Core better presenting validity of clinical trials.基于都柏林核心元数据的循证医学元数据能更好地呈现临床试验的有效性。
J Med Syst. 2007 Oct;31(5):337-43. doi: 10.1007/s10916-007-9073-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.迈向完整、准确的诊断准确性研究报告：STARD倡议。
BMJ. 2003 Jan 4;326(7379):41-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41.
2
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.用于报告诊断准确性研究的STARD声明：解释与详述
Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):7-18. doi: 10.1373/49.1.7.
3
Videokeratography findings in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis versus those of healthy children.春季角结膜炎患儿与健康儿童的角膜地形图检查结果对比
Ophthalmology. 2002 Nov;109(11):2018-23. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01218-6.
4
Wavefront aberrations measured with Hartmann-Shack sensor in patients with keratoconus.使用哈特曼-夏克传感器测量圆锥角膜患者的波前像差。
Ophthalmology. 2002 Nov;109(11):1996-2003. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01279-4.
5
Use of magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate optic neuritis and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.利用磁共振成像鉴别视神经炎和非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变。
Ophthalmology. 2002 Sep;109(9):1679-84. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01148-x.
6
Predictive value of short-wavelength automated perimetry: a 3-year follow-up study.短波长自动视野计的预测价值：一项为期3年的随访研究。
Ophthalmology. 2002 Apr;109(4):761-5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)01014-4.
7
Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.医疗保健中的系统评价：诊断和筛查试验评估的系统评价。
BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):157-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157.
8
Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials.流程图在随机对照试验报告中的价值。
JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1996-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.1996.
9
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.CONSORT声明的使用与随机试验报告的质量：一项前后对比评估
JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1992-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.1992.
10
The quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials published in Ophthalmology.发表于《眼科学》杂志的随机临床试验报告质量
Ophthalmology. 2001 Feb;108(2):410-5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00500-5.

眼科期刊上发表的诊断准确性研究的报告质量。

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals.

作者信息

Siddiqui M A R, Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Grampian University Hospital NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;89(3):261-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.051862.

DOI:10.1136/bjo.2004.051862
PMID:15722299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1772540/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the quality of reporting of all diagnostic studies published in five major ophthalmic journals in the year 2002 using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative parameters.

METHODS

Manual searching was used to identify diagnostic studies published in 2002 in five leading ophthalmic journals, the American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO), Archives of Ophthalmology (Archives), British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO), Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (IOVS), and Ophthalmology. The STARD checklist of 25 items and flow chart was used to evaluate the quality of each publication.

RESULTS

A total of 16 publications were included (AJO = 5, Archives = 1, BJO = 2, IOVS = 2, and Ophthalmology = 6). More than half of the studies (n = 9) were related to glaucoma diagnosis. Other specialties included retina (n = 4) cornea (n = 2), and neuro-ophthalmology (n = 1). The most common description of diagnostic accuracy was sensitivity and specificity values, published in 13 articles. The number of fully reported items in evaluated studies ranged from eight to 19. Seven studies reported more than 50% of the STARD items.

CONCLUSIONS

The current standards of reporting of diagnostic accuracy tests are highly variable. The STARD initiative may be a useful tool for appraising the strengths and weaknesses of diagnostic accuracy studies.

摘要

目的

使用诊断准确性报告标准（STARD）倡议参数评估2002年在五本主要眼科期刊上发表的所有诊断性研究的报告质量。

方法

采用人工检索的方法，确定2002年在五本领先的眼科期刊上发表的诊断性研究，这五本期刊分别是《美国眼科杂志》（AJO）、《眼科学档案》（Archives）、《英国眼科杂志》（BJO）、《眼科研究与视觉科学》（IOVS）和《眼科学》。使用包含25个条目的STARD清单和流程图来评估每篇出版物的质量。

结果

共纳入16篇出版物（AJO = 5篇、Archives = 1篇、BJO = 2篇、IOVS = 2篇、Ophthalmology = 6篇）。超过半数的研究（n = 9）与青光眼诊断相关。其他专业领域包括视网膜（n = 4）、角膜（n = 2）和神经眼科（n = 1）。诊断准确性最常见的描述是敏感性和特异性值，13篇文章中发表了这些内容。评估研究中完整报告条目的数量从8个到19个不等。七项研究报告了超过50%的STARD条目。

结论

目前诊断准确性测试的报告标准差异很大。STARD倡议可能是评估诊断准确性研究优缺点的有用工具。