Suppr超能文献

瑞士和美国成年人瘦体重与体脂的比较。

Comparison of fat-free mass and body fat in Swiss and American adults.

作者信息

Kyle Ursula G, Genton Laurence, Lukaski Henry C, Dupertuis Yves M, Slosman Daniel O, Hans Didier, Pichard Claude

机构信息

Department of Clinical Nutrition, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nutrition. 2005 Feb;21(2):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.04.023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

No current studies have compared North American with European body composition parameters, i.e., fat-free mass (FFM), body fat (BF), and percentage of BF (%BF) in large populations. This study compared FFM, BF, and %BF values derived from two bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) equations (Geneva and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES]) in Swiss subjects and compared FFM, BF, and %BF values of white Swiss with those of white North American adults with the same BIA equations.

METHODS

Healthy adults (3714 men and 3199 women), ages 20 to 79 y, in Switzerland were measured by single-frequency BIA and compared with means and standard deviations for body mass index and body composition parameters obtained from the NHANES III study (United States; n = 2538 men, 2862 women). FFM was calculated with the Geneva and NHANES equations.

RESULTS

Mean FFMGENEVA values did not differ from FFMNHANES values in men but was significantly lower (-1.5 kg) in women. FFM and BF values in American men, who weighed 4.2 to 12.0 kg more than the Swiss men, were significantly higher (+2.1 to +6.0 kg and +1.5 to +6.4 kg, respectively) than those in the Swiss men. FFM and BF values in American women, who weighed 2.3 to 12.1 kg more than the Swiss women, were significantly higher (+1.3 to +2.1 kg and +4.8 to +11.8 kg, respectively, except FFM in subjects ages 20 to 29 y and BF in those ages 70 to 79 y) than FFMGENEVA values in Swiss women. FFM in American women was significantly lower (+1.3 and +1.9 kg) and non-significantly higher than FFMNHANES in Swiss women.

CONCLUSION

NHANES and Geneva BIA equations estimate body composition equally well in men, but further research is necessary to determine the discrepancies in FFM between BIA equations in women. The greater weight of the American subjects yielded higher values for FFM, BF, and %BF in American than in Swiss men and women.

摘要

目的

目前尚无研究在大量人群中比较北美和欧洲的身体成分参数,即去脂体重(FFM)、体脂(BF)和体脂百分比(%BF)。本研究比较了瑞士受试者根据两种生物电阻抗分析(BIA)方程(日内瓦方程和美国国家健康与营养检查调查[NHANES]方程)得出的FFM、BF和%BF值,并使用相同的BIA方程比较了瑞士白人的FFM、BF和%BF值与北美成年白人的相应值。

方法

对瑞士年龄在20至79岁的健康成年人(3714名男性和3199名女性)进行单频BIA测量,并与从NHANES III研究(美国;2538名男性,2862名女性)获得的体重指数和身体成分参数的均值及标准差进行比较。使用日内瓦方程和NHANES方程计算FFM。

结果

男性的平均FFMGENEVA值与FFMNHANES值无差异,但女性的平均FFMGENEVA值显著更低(低1.5千克)。体重比瑞士男性重4.2至12.0千克的美国男性,其FFM和BF值显著高于瑞士男性(分别高2.1至6.0千克和1.5至6.4千克)。体重比瑞士女性重2.3至12.1千克的美国女性,其FFM和BF值显著高于瑞士女性的FFMGENEVA值(分别高1.3至2.1千克和4.8至11.8千克,20至29岁受试者的FFM和70至79岁受试者的BF除外)。美国女性的FFM显著低于瑞士女性(低1.3和1.9千克),且比瑞士女性的FFMNHANES略高但不显著。

结论

NHANES方程和日内瓦BIA方程在男性中对身体成分的估计效果相当,但需要进一步研究以确定女性中BIA方程在FFM方面的差异。美国受试者体重更重,导致其FFM、BF和%BF值高于瑞士男性和女性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验