体外受精后将胚胎移植到子宫或输卵管，结果相似。
Embryo transfer to the uterus or the fallopian tube after in vitro fertilization yields similar results.
作者信息
Toth T L, Oehninger S, Toner J P, Brzyski R G, Acosta A A, Muasher S J
机构信息
Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk 23507.
出版信息
Fertil Steril. 1992 May;57(5):1110-3. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55033-x.
The outcome of ZIFT and IVF-ET was compared in consecutive nontubal factor patients in a prospective fashion. Groups did not differ in characteristics and were matched by the number of prezygotes/pre-embryos transferred. Overall, implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and ongoing PRs were not statistically different. These results suggest that ZIFT offers no significant advantage over IVF-ET for the treatment of nontubal infertility.
我们以前瞻性的方式比较了连续的非输卵管因素患者中合子输卵管内移植（ZIFT）和体外受精-胚胎移植（IVF-ET）的结果。两组患者的特征没有差异，并且根据移植的受精卵/胚胎前体数量进行了匹配。总体而言，着床、妊娠、流产和持续妊娠率在统计学上没有显著差异。这些结果表明，在治疗非输卵管性不孕症方面，合子输卵管内移植相较于体外受精-胚胎移植并无显著优势。
Zotero 插件