Suppr超能文献

一种治疗嵌甲的新解剖修复方法:甲床楔形切除术与部分甲床切除术联合外侧皮瓣推进术的前瞻性比较

A new anatomical repair method for the treatment of ingrown nail: prospective comparison of wedge resection of the matrix and partial matricectomy followed by lateral fold advancement flap.

作者信息

Cöloğlu Harun, Koçer Uğur, Sungur Nezih, Uysal Afşin, Kankaya Yüksel, Oruç Melike

机构信息

Ankara Training and Research Hospital, First Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Mar;54(3):306-11; discussion 312.

Abstract

Currently, there are various surgical treatment modalities for ingrowing nail. None of these procedures are perfect to achieve esthetic results with low cost, recurrence, and complication rates. Eighty-seven toenails of 77 patients were operated in our clinic; 49 wedge matrix resections (WMR) and 38 partial matricectomy followed by lateral fold advancement flap (LFAF) were applied. Average follow-up period of the patients was 13 months. The recurrence rates, spicule formation, immobilization periods, and patient satisfaction for cosmetic result and discomforting symptoms were investigated. Nail, distal phalanx bone, soft tissue measurements were performed in the counterlateral healthy toe of 34 patients that we operated due to the unilateral ingrowing nail and 34 randomized individuals with no ingrowing nail by lateral and anteroposterior toe x-rays. There were no significant differences for age, sex, the side of the ingrowing nail, postoperative mobilization period, and the follow-up period between 2 groups that the techniques were applied to. There was no statistically significant difference in WMR (8.1%, 4 toes) and LFAF (none) for the recurrence rate. But there was significant difference between WMR (36.7%, 18 toes) and LFAF (5.2%, 2 toes) for the spicule formation rates (P < 0.05), and there was significant difference between WMR (20.4%, 10 toes) and LFAF (none) for the reoperation (P < 0.03). It was observed that patient satisfaction in cosmetic view was better in patient group treated with LFAF (P < 0.05). Phalanx heads were wider in patient group with ingrowing nail at the results of the measurements (P < 0.01). The fact that granulation and scarred tissues are removed instead of performing the great soft tissue excisions is more correct for both recurrence and cosmetics. Partial matricectomy and LFAF is a good alternative method for the treatment of ingrown nail, with less recurrence rates and cost and better cosmetic results.

摘要

目前,对于嵌甲有多种手术治疗方式。这些手术中没有一种能在低成本、低复发率和低并发症发生率的情况下达到美观的效果。我们诊所对77例患者的87个趾甲进行了手术;采用了49例楔形甲床切除术(WMR)和38例部分甲床切除术联合外侧皮瓣推进术(LFAF)。患者的平均随访期为13个月。对复发率、刺状物形成、固定期以及患者对美容效果和不适症状的满意度进行了调查。通过足部正侧位X线片,对34例因单侧嵌甲而接受手术的患者以及34例随机选取的无嵌甲的个体的对侧健康趾甲进行了趾甲、远节趾骨、软组织测量。应用这两种技术的两组患者在年龄、性别、嵌甲侧别、术后活动期和随访期方面均无显著差异。WMR组的复发率为8.1%(4个趾甲),LFAF组无复发,两组复发率无统计学显著差异。但WMR组的刺状物形成率为36.7%(18个趾甲),LFAF组为5.2%(2个趾甲),两组刺状物形成率有显著差异(P < 0.05);WMR组的再次手术率为20.4%(10个趾甲),LFAF组无再次手术,两组再次手术率有显著差异(P < 0.03)。观察发现,LFAF治疗组患者在美容方面的满意度更高(P < 0.05)。测量结果显示,嵌甲患者组的趾骨头更宽(P < 0.01)。相较于进行大面积软组织切除,去除肉芽组织和瘢痕组织对于预防复发和美观而言更为恰当。部分甲床切除术联合LFAF是治疗嵌甲的一种较好的替代方法,具有较低的复发率和成本,以及更好的美容效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验