• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对儿童焦虑症的结构化访谈,电话访谈与现场访谈结果的一致性。

Agreement between telephone and in-person delivery of a structured interview for anxiety disorders in children.

作者信息

Lyneham Heidi J, Rapee Ronald M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;44(3):274-82. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200503000-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00004583-200503000-00012
PMID:15725972
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The current study determined the viability of using the telephone to facilitate assessment of children using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for children for DSM-IV (ADIS-C-IV).

METHOD

Diagnoses established during telephone administration of the ADIS-C-IV-Parent version were compared with diagnoses obtained during standard administration of the ADIS-C-IV using both Child and Parent versions. Seventy-three children and their parents participated in counterbalanced, repeated assessments.

RESULTS

The level of agreement between telephone and standard administration for principal diagnosis (kappa=0.86), individual anxiety disorders (kappa=0.63-0.86), and other disorders (kappa=0.79-0.91) were in the good to excellent range. Additionally, agreement on overall suitability for an anxiety treatment program was excellent (kappa=0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate that telephone administration of the ADIS-C-IV is a valid way to differentiate children who have anxiety disorders from those who have no disorder or other disorders, providing a less resource-demanding alternative to face-to-face assessment.

摘要

目的

本研究确定了使用电话通过《儿童焦虑症访谈量表(DSM-IV)》(ADIS-C-IV)对儿童进行评估的可行性。

方法

将ADIS-C-IV家长版电话施测时确立的诊断结果,与使用儿童版和家长版ADIS-C-IV进行标准施测时获得的诊断结果进行比较。73名儿童及其家长参与了平衡的重复评估。

结果

电话施测与标准施测在主要诊断(kappa=0.86)、个体焦虑症(kappa=0.63 - 0.86)和其他障碍(kappa=0.79 - 0.91)方面的一致性水平处于良好到优秀范围。此外,在焦虑治疗项目总体适用性方面的一致性极佳(kappa=0.97)。

结论

数据表明,通过电话施测ADIS-C-IV是区分患有焦虑症的儿童与无疾病或患有其他疾病儿童的有效方法,为面对面评估提供了一种资源需求较少的替代方式。

相似文献

1
Agreement between telephone and in-person delivery of a structured interview for anxiety disorders in children.针对儿童焦虑症的结构化访谈,电话访谈与现场访谈结果的一致性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;44(3):274-82. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200503000-00012.
2
Test-retest reliability of anxiety symptoms and diagnoses with the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: child and parent versions.使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版焦虑症访谈量表(儿童版和家长版)对焦虑症状及诊断进行重测信度研究。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;40(8):937-44. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200108000-00016.
3
Childhood anxiety disorders: parent-child (dis)agreement using a structured interview for the DSM-IV.儿童焦虑症:使用针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)的结构化访谈评估亲子间的(不)一致性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;42(8):957-64. doi: 10.1097/01.CHI.0000046898.27264.A2.
4
Concurrent validity of the anxiety disorders section of the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: child and parent versions.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版焦虑症访谈量表焦虑症部分的同时效度:儿童版与家长版
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002 Sep;31(3):335-42. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3103_05.
5
Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID).《儿童和青少年迷你国际神经精神访谈(MINI-KID)的信度和效度》。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):313-26. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05305whi.
6
Comparability between telephone and face-to-face structured clinical interview for DSM-IV in assessing social anxiety disorder.在评估社交焦虑障碍时,电话与面对面进行的DSM-IV结构化临床访谈之间的可比性。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2008 Oct;44(4):241-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6163.2008.00183.x.
7
Multiple informant agreement and the anxiety disorders interview schedule for parents and children.多信息提供者一致性与父母和儿童焦虑症访谈量表
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;42(1):30-40. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200301000-00008.
8
Reliability of the DSM-III-R childhood anxiety disorders using structured interview: interrater and parent-child agreement.使用结构化访谈评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》中儿童焦虑症的可靠性:评分者间及亲子间的一致性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;33(7):984-92. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199409000-00008.
9
Screening capacity of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC) for DSM-IV anxiety disorders.儿童多维焦虑量表(MASC)对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)焦虑症的筛查能力。
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(12):1046-52. doi: 10.1002/da.20452.
10
Child anxiety in primary care: prevalent but untreated.基层医疗中的儿童焦虑症:普遍存在但未得到治疗。
Depress Anxiety. 2004;20(4):155-64. doi: 10.1002/da.20039.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal Clustering of Psychopathology Across Childhood and Adolescence: An Approach Toward Developmentally Based Classification.儿童期和青少年期精神病理学的纵向聚类:一种基于发展的分类方法。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1177/21677026251357589.
2
The Role of Early Engagement in a Self-Directed, Digital Mental Health Intervention for Adolescent Anxiety: Moderated Regression Analysis.早期参与在青少年焦虑的自我导向数字心理健康干预中的作用:调节回归分析
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025 Jun 2;8:e60523. doi: 10.2196/60523.
3
Evaluating a program to prevent anxiety in children of anxious parents: a randomized controlled trial.
评估一项预防焦虑父母的孩子焦虑的项目:一项随机对照试验。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Sep;66(9):1345-1356. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14151. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
4
Peer Relationships and Social Media Use in Adolescents with Body Dysmorphic Disorder.患有躯体变形障碍的青少年的同伴关系与社交媒体使用情况
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Jan;53(1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01245-2. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
5
Quality of asynchronous webchats in-person consultations for postpartum depression in China: a cross-sectional, mixed methods study using standardized patients.中国产后抑郁症异步网络聊天与面对面咨询的质量:一项使用标准化患者的横断面混合方法研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Mar 28;45:101053. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101053. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Piloting a one-day parent-only intervention in the treatment of youth with anxiety disorders: child and family-level outcomes.试行针对焦虑症青少年的为期一天的仅家长参与的干预措施:儿童及家庭层面的结果。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Jan 13;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00702-y.
7
FAST CBT for pediatric OCD: A multiple-baseline controlled pilot trial of parent training in exposure and response prevention delivered telehealth.针对儿童强迫症的快速认知行为疗法:一项通过远程医疗提供的暴露与反应阻止法家长培训的多基线对照试验。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 13;13:1009735. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009735. eCollection 2022.
8
Minimising Young Children's Anxiety through Schools (MY-CATS): statistical analysis plan for a cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an online parent-led intervention compared with usual school practice for young children identified as at risk for anxiety disorders.通过学校减少幼儿焦虑(MY-CATS):一项评估在线家长主导干预措施对被认定为有焦虑障碍风险的幼儿的有效性和成本效益的集群随机对照试验的统计分析计划,与常规学校实践相比。
Trials. 2022 Dec 28;23(1):1054. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06899-1.
9
One-session treatment compared with multisession CBT in children aged 7-16 years with specific phobias: the ASPECT non-inferiority RCT.单一疗程治疗与多次认知行为疗法治疗 7-16 岁特定恐惧症儿童的比较:ASPECT 非劣效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(42):1-174. doi: 10.3310/IBCT0609.
10
Minimising young children's anxiety through schools (MY-CATS): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an online parent-led intervention compared with usual school practice for young children identified as at risk for anxiety disorders.通过学校减少幼儿焦虑(MY-CATS):一项群组随机对照试验方案,旨在评估一种在线家长主导的干预措施相对于常规学校实践对被认定为有焦虑障碍风险的幼儿的有效性和成本效益,该干预措施由家长主导。
Trials. 2022 Feb 16;23(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06010-8.