Frazee Bradley W, Lynn Jeremy, Charlebois Edwin D, Lambert Larry, Lowery Derrick, Perdreau-Remington Francoise
Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center-Highland Campus, Oakland, CA 94602, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;45(3):311-20. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.10.011.
We sought to determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among emergency department (ED) patients with skin and soft tissue infections, identify demographic and clinical variables associated with MRSA, and characterize MRSA by antimicrobial susceptibility and genotype.
This was a prospective observational study involving a convenience sample of patients who presented with skin and soft tissue infections to a single urban public hospital ED in California. Nares and infection site cultures were obtained. A health and lifestyle questionnaire was administered, and predictor variables independently associated with MRSA were determined by multivariate logistic regression. All S aureus isolates underwent antibiotic susceptibility testing. Eighty-five MRSA isolates underwent genotyping by pulsed field gel electrophoresis, staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec (SCC mec ) typing, and testing for Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes.
Of 137 subjects, 18% were homeless, 28% injected illicit drugs, 63% presented with a deep or superficial abscess, and 26% required admission for the infection. MRSA was present in 51% of infection site cultures. Of 119 S aureus isolates (from infection site and nares), 89 (75%) were MRSA. Antimicrobial susceptibility among MRSA isolates was trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 100%, clindamycin 94%, tetracycline 86%, and levofloxacin 57%. Among predictor variables independently associated with MRSA infection, the strongest was infection type being furuncle (odds ratio 28.6). Seventy-six percent of MRSA cases fit the clinical definition of community associated. Ninety-nine percent of MRSA isolates possessed the SCC mec IV allele (typical of community-associated MRSA), 94.1% possessed Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes, and 87.1% belonged to a single clonal group (ST8:S).
In this urban ED population, MRSA is a major pathogen in skin and soft tissue infections. Although studies from other practice settings are needed, MRSA should be considered when empiric antibiotic therapy is selected for such infections.
我们试图确定急诊科(ED)皮肤和软组织感染患者中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的患病率,识别与MRSA相关的人口统计学和临床变量,并通过抗菌药物敏感性和基因型对MRSA进行特征分析。
这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了加利福尼亚州一家城市公立医院急诊科就诊的皮肤和软组织感染患者的便利样本。采集鼻腔和感染部位的培养物。发放健康和生活方式问卷,并通过多因素逻辑回归确定与MRSA独立相关的预测变量。所有金黄色葡萄球菌分离株均进行抗生素敏感性测试。85株MRSA分离株通过脉冲场凝胶电泳、葡萄球菌染色体盒式mec(SCC mec)分型以及杀白细胞素基因检测进行基因分型。
137名受试者中,18%无家可归,28%注射非法药物,63%表现为深部或浅表脓肿,26%因感染需要住院治疗。51%的感染部位培养物中存在MRSA。在119株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株(来自感染部位和鼻腔)中,89株(75%)为MRSA。MRSA分离株的抗菌药物敏感性为:甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑100%,克林霉素94%,四环素86%,左氧氟沙星57%。在与MRSA感染独立相关的预测变量中,最强的是感染类型为疖(比值比28.6)。76%的MRSA病例符合社区获得性的临床定义。99%的MRSA分离株具有SCC mec IV等位基因(社区获得性MRSA的典型特征),94.1%具有杀白细胞素基因,87.1%属于单一克隆群(ST8:S)。
在这个城市急诊科人群中,MRSA是皮肤和软组织感染的主要病原体。尽管需要来自其他医疗机构的研究,但在为这类感染选择经验性抗生素治疗时应考虑MRSA。