Suppr超能文献

使用16层螺旋CT及用于心内膜和心外膜边界描绘的新软件评估左心室参数。

Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation.

作者信息

Schlosser Thomas, Pagonidis Konstantin, Herborn Christoph U, Hunold Peter, Waltering Kai-Uwe, Lauenstein Thomas C, Barkhausen Jörg

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Mar;184(3):765-73. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840765.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to quantify left ventricular function and mass derived from retrospectively ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography data sets using a new analysis software based on automatic contour detection in comparison to corresponding standard of reference measurements acquired with MRI.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Multiplanar reformations in the short-axis orientation were calculated from axial contrast-enhanced CT images in 18 patients (men, 15; women, three; age range, 38-70 years; mean, 57.4 +/- 10.2 [SD] years) who were referred for CT coronary angiography. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular mass (LVM) were analyzed with a recently developed imaging software using an automated contour detection algorithm of left ventricular endo- and epicardial contours and by manual tracing. The data were compared with similar measurements on MRI as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

EDV, ESV, EF, and LVM derived from an automated contour detection algorithm were not statistically significantly different from manual tracing (CT(auto) vs CT(manual): EDV = 137.1 +/- 45.7 mL vs 134.2 +/- 39.9 mL, ESV = 58.8 +/- 34.2 mL vs 58.1 +/-30.1 mL, EF = 59.2% +/- 13.7% vs 58.1% +/- 12.0%, LVM = 130.9 +/- 29.1 g vs 133.7 +/- 33.2 g; p > 0.05). However, EDV (118.7 +/- 43.6 mL), ESV (50.1 +/- 33.5 mL), and LVM (142.8 +/-38.4 g) as calculated on MR data sets were statistically significantly different from those calculated on CT (p < 0.05), whereas MRI-based EF (59.9% +/- 14.4%) did not differ statistically significantly from those based on both CT algorithms (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Automatic and manual analysis of data acquired during CT coronary angiography using a 16-MDCT scanner allows a reliable assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and a rough estimation of left ventricular volumes and mass.

摘要

目的

我们研究的目的是使用一种基于自动轮廓检测的新型分析软件,对回顾性心电图门控16层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影数据集得出的左心室功能和质量进行量化,并与通过MRI获得的相应参考标准测量值进行比较。

对象与方法

从18例因CT冠状动脉造影而就诊的患者(男性15例,女性3例;年龄范围38 - 70岁,平均57.4±10.2[标准差]岁)的轴向对比增强CT图像计算短轴方向的多平面重建图像。使用最近开发的成像软件,通过自动检测左心室内外膜轮廓的算法并结合手动追踪,分析舒张末期容积(EDV)、收缩末期容积(ESV)、射血分数(EF)和左心室质量(LVM)。将这些数据与作为参考标准的MRI上的类似测量值进行比较。

结果

自动轮廓检测算法得出的EDV、ESV、EF和LVM与手动追踪所得结果在统计学上无显著差异(CT(自动)与CT(手动)比较:EDV = 137.1±45.7 mL对134.2±39.9 mL,ESV = 58.8±34.2 mL对58.1±30.1 mL,EF = 59.2%±13.7%对58.1%±12.0%,LVM = 130.9±29.1 g对133.7±33.2 g;p>0.05)。然而,MR数据集计算得出的EDV(118.7±43.6 mL)、ESV(50.1±33.5 mL)和LVM(142.8±38.4 g)与CT计算得出的结果在统计学上有显著差异(p<0.05),而基于MRI的EF(59.9%±14.4%)与基于两种CT算法得出的结果在统计学上无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

使用16层螺旋CT扫描仪对CT冠状动脉造影期间采集的数据进行自动和手动分析,能够可靠地评估左心室射血分数,并大致估算左心室容积和质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验