Labahn R, Fahrenbach W H, Clark S M, Lie T, Adams D F
Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Portland.
J Periodontol. 1992 Apr;63(4):303-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.4.303.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of citric acid and tetracycline HCl application to dentin surfaces by a "passive dripping" or an "active burnishing" technique. Twenty dentin blocks were prepared from freshly extracted non-diseased human impacted third molars. The blocks were root planed and randomly assigned to two groups for treatment with either citric acid or tetracycline HCl. The duration of treatment was 30, 60, 120, or 240 seconds. Control blocks were treated with distilled water. After treatment the blocks were processed for observation and measurements in the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Application of either of the acid solutions resulted in removal of the smear layer. Measurements indicated a time dependent increase in the mean dentinal tubule orifice diameter ranging from 1.05 microns in control specimens to 3.18 microns after 4 minutes treatment (citric acid group). The increase in tubule diameter was significantly greater (P less than or equal to 0.01) for both citric acid treatment modalities than tetracycline HCl treatment. There was also a time dependent increase in the depth of penetration as measured by a trumpeting of the tubule profiles, and this penetration was significantly greater (P less than or equal to 0.01) after citric acid treatments. Passive or active application of the acids did not seem to have any major impact on the measurements or on the surface morphology. It was concluded that citric acid causes more extensive changes than tetracycline HCl and that the mode of application of the agent is probably not critical.
本研究的目的是评估通过“被动滴注”或“主动抛光”技术将柠檬酸和盐酸四环素应用于牙本质表面的效果。从新拔除的无病变人类阻生第三磨牙制备了20个牙本质块。将这些牙本质块进行根面平整,并随机分为两组,分别用柠檬酸或盐酸四环素进行处理。处理时间为30、60、120或240秒。对照牙本质块用蒸馏水进行处理。处理后,将这些牙本质块进行处理,以便在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下进行观察和测量。两种酸溶液的应用均导致玷污层的去除。测量结果表明,牙本质小管口平均直径随时间增加,从对照标本中的1.05微米增加到处理4分钟后(柠檬酸组)的3.18微米。柠檬酸处理的两种方式导致的小管直径增加均显著大于(P≤0.01)盐酸四环素处理。通过小管轮廓的喇叭口测量,渗透深度也随时间增加,并且柠檬酸处理后的这种渗透显著更大(P≤0.01)。酸的被动或主动应用似乎对测量结果或表面形态没有任何重大影响。得出的结论是,柠檬酸比盐酸四环素引起更广泛的变化,并且该试剂的应用方式可能并不关键。