Gurbel Paul A, Bliden Kevin P, Zaman Kazi A, Yoho Jason A, Hayes Kevin M, Tantry Udaya S
Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Hoffberger Bldg, Suite 56, 2401 W Belvedere Ave, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Circulation. 2005 Mar 8;111(9):1153-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157138.02645.11. Epub 2005 Feb 28.
Pretreatment is not the most common strategy practiced for clopidogrel administration in elective coronary stenting. Moreover, limited information is available on the antiplatelet pharmacodynamics of a 300-mg versus a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose, and the comparative effect of eptifibatide with these regimens is unknown.
Patients undergoing elective stenting (n=120) were enrolled in a 2x2 factorial study (300 mg clopidogrel with or without eptifibatide; 600 mg clopidogrel with or without eptifibatide) (Clopidogrel Loading With Eptifibatide to Arrest the Reactivity of Platelets [CLEAR PLATELETS] Study). Clopidogrel was administered immediately after stenting. Aggregometry and flow cytometry were used to assess platelet reactivity. Eptifibatide added a > or =2-fold increase in platelet inhibition to 600 mg clopidogrel alone at 3, 8, and 18 to 24 hours after stenting as measured by 5 micromol/L ADP-induced aggregation (P<0.001). Without eptifibatide, 600 mg clopidogrel produced better inhibition than 300 mg clopidogrel at all time points (P<0.001). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) blockade was associated with lower cardiac marker release. Active GPIIb/IIIa expression was inhibited most in the groups treated with eptifibatide (P<0.05).
In elective stenting without clopidogrel pretreatment, use of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor produces superior platelet inhibition and lower myocardial necrosis compared with high-dose (600 mg) or standard-dose (300 mg) clopidogrel loading alone. In the absence of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor, 600 mg clopidogrel provides better platelet inhibition than the standard 300-mg dose. These results require confirmation in a large-scale clinical trial.
在择期冠状动脉支架置入术中,预处理并非氯吡格雷给药的最常用策略。此外,关于300毫克与600毫克氯吡格雷负荷剂量的抗血小板药效学信息有限,且依替巴肽与这些方案的比较效果尚不清楚。
接受择期支架置入术的患者(n = 120)被纳入一项2×2析因研究(300毫克氯吡格雷联合或不联合依替巴肽;600毫克氯吡格雷联合或不联合依替巴肽)(依替巴肽联合氯吡格雷负荷以抑制血小板反应性[CLEAR PLATELETS]研究)。支架置入术后立即给予氯吡格雷。采用血小板聚集测定法和流式细胞术评估血小板反应性。通过5微摩尔/升二磷酸腺苷诱导的聚集测定,在支架置入术后3、8以及18至24小时,依替巴肽使单独使用600毫克氯吡格雷时的血小板抑制增加≥2倍(P<0.001)。在没有依替巴肽的情况下,600毫克氯吡格雷在所有时间点均比300毫克氯吡格雷产生更好的抑制效果(P<0.001)。糖蛋白IIb/IIIa(GPIIb/IIIa)阻断与较低的心脏标志物释放相关。在用依替巴肽治疗的组中,活性GPIIb/IIIa表达受到的抑制最大(P<0.05)。
在未进行氯吡格雷预处理的择期支架置入术中,与单独使用高剂量(600毫克)或标准剂量(300毫克)氯吡格雷负荷相比,使用GPIIb/IIIa抑制剂可产生更好的血小板抑制效果以及更低的心肌坏死。在没有GPIIb/IIIa抑制剂的情况下,600毫克氯吡格雷比标准的300毫克剂量提供更好的血小板抑制效果。这些结果需要在大规模临床试验中得到证实。