• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effects of signal presentation level and word duration on gated word-recognition performance.

作者信息

Craig C H, Kim B W

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, WI 53201.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Apr;35(2):472-6. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3502.472.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.3502.472
PMID:1573884
Abstract

This study examined the effects of signal presentation level and word duration on time-gated isolated monosyllabic word-recognition performance. Measures of listener confidence, word identification, isolation point (IP), confidence at IP, and acceptance point were obtained from normal-hearing listeners. Subjects were presented with non-time-gated and time-gated speech stimuli at 40 dB SPL (N = 21). The resulting performance measures were compared with previously reported results obtained using an 80-dB SPL presentation level. The speech stimuli consisted of 60-msec time-gated isolated monosyllabic words developed from a prerecorded 50-item list (Auditec, NU-6). Comparisons were drawn between presentation levels, word durations, and time-gated and non-time-gated presentation conditions. Poorer accuracy and longer isolation points were observed at the lower signal presentation level. The findings further indicated that listener confidence at IP was only indirectly influenced by presentation level. Monosyllabic word duration was a significant factor in on-line recognition performance, regardless of presentation level.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effects of signal presentation level and word duration on gated word-recognition performance.
J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Apr;35(2):472-6. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3502.472.
2
Effects of time gating and word length on isolated word-recognition performance.时间选通和单词长度对孤立单词识别性能的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Dec;33(4):808-15. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3304.808.
3
A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.采用随机呈现水平范式,对听力正常的年轻听众和患有感音神经性听力损失的老年听众在西北大学听觉测试第6号的Auditec和退伍军人事务部(VA)录制版本上的单词识别表现进行比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 May;30(5):370-395. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17135. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
4
Effects of the Carrier Phrase on Word Recognition Performances by Younger and Older Listeners Using Two Stimulus Paradigms.载体短语对使用两种刺激范式的年轻和年长听众的单词识别表现的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):412-441. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19061. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.语音识别对时间和频谱失真材料的影响:年龄和听力损失的作用。
Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):349-66. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318242571c.
6
Effects of aging on time-gated isolated word-recognition performance.
J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Feb;35(1):234-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3501.234.
7
Recognition Performance of Interrupted Monosyllabic Words: The Effects of Ten Interruption Locations.中断单音节词的识别性能:十个中断位置的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jul-Aug;26(7):670-7. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15014.
8
Amplitude (vu and rms) and Temporal (msec) Measures of Two Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 Recordings.西北大学听觉测试6号的两份录音的幅度(音量单位和均方根)及时间(毫秒)测量值
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Apr;26(4):346-54. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.4.3.
9
Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.训练对年轻听力正常者和老年听力受损者在噪声环境下单词识别能力的影响。
Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):263-78. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215980.21158.a2.
10
The effect of presentation level on memory performance.呈现水平对记忆表现的影响。
Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):524-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820a0281.