Jasper Ahren W, Truhlar Donald G
Department of Chemistry and Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0431, USA.
J Chem Phys. 2005 Jan 22;122(4):44101. doi: 10.1063/1.1829031.
Semiclassical trajectory methods are tested for electronically nonadiabatic systems with conical intersections. Five triatomic model systems are presented, and each system features two electronic states that intersect via a seam of conical intersections (CIs). Fully converged, full-dimensional quantum mechanical scattering calculations are carried out for all five systems at energies that allow for electronic de-excitation via the seam of CIs. Several semiclassical trajectory methods are tested against the accurate quantum mechanical results. For four of the five model systems, the diabatic representation is the preferred (most accurate) representation for semiclassical trajectories, as correctly predicted by the Calaveras County criterion. Four surface hopping methods are tested and have overall relative errors of 40%-60%. The semiclassical Ehrenfest method has an overall error of 66%, and the self-consistent decay of mixing (SCDM) and coherent switches with decay of mixing (CSDM) methods are the most accurate methods overall with relative errors of approximately 32%. Furthermore, the CSDM method is less representation dependent than both the SCDM and the surface hopping methods, making it the preferred semiclassical trajectory method. Finally, the behavior of semiclassical trajectories near conical intersections is discussed.
半经典轨迹方法被用于测试具有锥形交叉点的电子非绝热系统。给出了五个三原子模型系统,每个系统都有两个通过锥形交叉点(CI)的接缝相交的电子态。在允许通过CI接缝进行电子去激发的能量下,对所有五个系统进行了完全收敛的全维量子力学散射计算。将几种半经典轨迹方法与精确的量子力学结果进行了比较。对于五个模型系统中的四个,如卡弗拉县准则所正确预测的,绝热表示是半经典轨迹的首选(最准确)表示。测试了四种表面跳跃方法,其总体相对误差为40%-60%。半经典埃伦费斯特方法的总体误差为66%,混合自洽衰减(SCDM)和带混合衰减的相干开关(CSDM)方法总体上是最准确的方法,相对误差约为32%。此外,CSDM方法比SCDM和表面跳跃方法对表示的依赖性更小,使其成为首选的半经典轨迹方法。最后,讨论了半经典轨迹在锥形交叉点附近的行为。