Itomura Miho, Hamazaki Kei, Sawazaki Shigeki, Kobayashi Makoto, Terasawa Katsutoshi, Watanabe Shiro, Hamazaki Tomohito
Division of Clinical Application, Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Natural Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Toyama, Japan 9300194.
J Nutr Biochem. 2005 Mar;16(3):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2004.10.009.
The aim of the study was to investigate whether fish oil supplementation affected Japanese schoolchildren's behavior, with changes in aggression over time as the primary endpoint.
A placebo-controlled double-blind study with 166 schoolchildren 9-12 years of age was performed. The subjects of the fish oil group (n=83) took fish oil-fortified foods (bread, sausage and spaghetti). These foods were provided in amounts such that each subject in the fish oil group had an intake of 3600 mg of docosahexaenoic acid+840 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)/week for 3 months. The rest (the controls, n=83) took control supplements. At the start and end of the study, psychological tests were performed to assess their aggression.
Physical aggression assessed by Hostility-Aggression Questionnaire for Children in girls increased significantly (median: 13 to 15, n=42) in the control group and did not change (13 to 13, n=43) in the fish oil group with a significant intergroup difference (P=.008) with baseline as covariate. The changes in physical aggression scores over time and those of the ratio of EPA/arachidonic acid in RBC (DeltaEPA/AA) were significantly correlated in girls who agreed to blood collection (r=-.53, P=.01, n=23). On the contrary, there were no significant changes in physical aggression in boys. Aggression against others (extraggression) assessed by Picture Frustration Study did not change in the control group (median: 5 to 5) but increased significantly in the fish oil group (4 to 5) with a significant intergroup difference (P=.02) with baseline as covariate. These changes in extraggression might be explained partly by significantly lower baseline values of extraggression in the fish oil group (P=.02) than in the control group. There were no significant correlations between Deltaextraggression and DeltaEPA/AA in blood-sampled children (n=49). Impulsivity of girls assessed by parents/guardians using the diagnostic criteria for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder of DSM-IV was reduced in the fish oil group (1 to 0) with a significant (P=.008) intergroup difference from the control group (1 to 1). There were no significant correlations between Deltaimpulsivity and DeltaEPA/AA in blood-sampled girls. In males, impulsivity reduced in both groups without any intergroup differences.
There is a possibility that changes in fatty acid nutrition might affect physical aggression especially in girls.
本研究旨在调查补充鱼油是否会影响日本学童的行为,将随着时间推移攻击行为的变化作为主要终点。
对166名9至12岁的学童进行了一项安慰剂对照双盲研究。鱼油组(n = 83)的研究对象食用了富含鱼油的食物(面包、香肠和意大利面)。这些食物的供应量使得鱼油组的每个研究对象每周摄入3600毫克二十二碳六烯酸 + 840毫克二十碳五烯酸(EPA),持续3个月。其余的(对照组,n = 83)服用对照补充剂。在研究开始和结束时,进行心理测试以评估他们的攻击性。
以儿童敌意 - 攻击问卷评估的身体攻击行为,在对照组女孩中显著增加(中位数:从13增至15,n = 42),而在鱼油组中没有变化(13至13,n = 43),以基线作为协变量时组间差异显著(P = .008)。在同意采血的女孩中,身体攻击分数随时间的变化与红细胞中EPA/花生四烯酸的比率变化(DeltaEPA/AA)显著相关(r = -.53,P = .01,n = 23)。相反,男孩的身体攻击行为没有显著变化。以图片挫折研究评估的对他人的攻击行为(外向攻击)在对照组中没有变化(中位数:5至5),但在鱼油组中显著增加(4至5),以基线作为协变量时组间差异显著(P = .02)。这些外向攻击行为的变化可能部分由鱼油组中外向攻击行为的基线值(P = .02)显著低于对照组来解释。在采血儿童(n = 49)中,Delta外向攻击与DeltaEPA/AA之间没有显著相关性。鱼油组中,父母/监护人使用DSM-IV注意力缺陷/多动障碍诊断标准评估的女孩冲动性降低(从1降至0),与对照组(1至1)组间差异显著(P = .008)。在采血女孩中,Delta冲动性与DeltaEPA/AA之间没有显著相关性。在男性中,两组的冲动性均降低,没有组间差异。
脂肪酸营养的变化可能会影响身体攻击行为,尤其是在女孩中。