Polevoi Steven K, Quinn James V, Kramer Nathan R
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0208, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;12(3):232-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.10.029.
Patients who leave without being seen (LWBS) can be an indicator of patient satisfaction and quality for emergency departments (ED). The objective of this study was to develop a model to determine factors associated with patients who LWBS.
A modified case-crossover design to determine the transient effects on the risk of acute events was used. Over a four-month period, time intervals when patients LWBS were matched (within two weeks), according to time of day and day of week, with time periods when patients did not LWBS. Factors considered were percentage of ED bed capacity, acuity of ED patients, length of stay of discharged patients in the ED, patients awaiting an admission bed in the ED, inpatient floor capacity, intensive care unit capacity, and the characteristics of the attending physician in charge. McNemar test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and conditional logistic regression analyses were used to determine significant variables.
Over the study period, there were 11,652 visits, of which 213 (1.8%) resulted in patients who LWBS. Measures of inpatient capacity were not associated with patients who LWBS and ED capacity was only associated when >100%. This association increased with increasing capacity. Other significant factors were older age (p < 0.01) and completion of an emergency medicine residency (p < 0.01) of the physician in charge. When factors were considered in a multivariate model, ED capacity >140% (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval = 1.22 to 3.17) and noncompletion of an emergency medicine residency (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval = 1.17 to 2.93) were most important.
ED capacity >100% is associated with patients who LWBS and is most significant at 140% capacity. ED capacity of 100% may not be a sensitive measure for overcrowding. Physician factors, especially emergency medicine training, also appear to be important when using LWBS as a quality indicator.
未经诊治自行离开(LWBS)的患者可作为急诊科患者满意度和质量的一个指标。本研究的目的是建立一个模型来确定与LWBS患者相关的因素。
采用一种改良的病例交叉设计来确定对急性事件风险的瞬时影响。在四个月的时间里,根据时间和星期几,将患者LWBS的时间间隔(两周内)与患者未LWBS的时间段进行匹配。考虑的因素包括急诊科床位容量百分比、急诊科患者的病情严重程度、出院患者在急诊科的停留时间、急诊科等待入院床位的患者、住院病房容量、重症监护病房容量以及主治医生的特征。采用McNemar检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和条件逻辑回归分析来确定显著变量。
在研究期间,共有11652次就诊,其中213例(1.8%)患者LWBS。住院容量指标与LWBS患者无关,只有当急诊科容量>100%时才有关联。这种关联随着容量的增加而增加。其他显著因素是年龄较大(p<0.01)和主治医生完成急诊医学住院医师培训(p<0.01)。在多变量模型中考虑这些因素时,急诊科容量>140%(比值比,1.96;95%置信区间=1.22至3.17)和未完成急诊医学住院医师培训(比值比,1.85;95%置信区间=1.17至2.93)最为重要。
急诊科容量>100%与LWBS患者有关,在容量为140%时最为显著。100%的急诊科容量可能不是拥挤程度的敏感指标。当将LWBS作为质量指标时,医生因素,尤其是急诊医学培训,似乎也很重要。