• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家研究患者、就诊和医院特征与离开急诊未被诊治的关系:预测 LWBS。

National study of patient, visit, and hospital characteristics associated with leaving an emergency department without being seen: predicting LWBS.

机构信息

From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;16(10):949-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00515.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00515.x
PMID:19799570
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to estimate the national left-without-being-seen (LWBS) rate and to identify patient, visit, and institutional characteristics that predict LWBS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 1998 to 2006. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of LWBS.

RESULTS

The national LWBS rate was 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6 to 1.9) patients per 100 emergency department (ED) visits each year. In multivariate analysis, patients at extremes of age (<18 years, odds ratio [OR] = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.96; and > or =65 years, OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.64) and nursing home residents (OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.08 to 1.00) were associated with lower LWBS rates. Nonwhites (black or African American (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.22 to 1.63) and Hispanic (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.49), Medicaid (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.70), self-pay (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.65 to 2.32), or other insurance (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.74 to 2.52) patients were more likely to LWBS. Visit characteristics associated with LWBS included visits for musculoskeletal (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.85), injury/poisoning/adverse event (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.80), and miscellaneous (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.05) complaints. Visits with low triage acuity were more likely to LWBS (OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 2.81 to 4.58), whereas visits that were work-related were less likely to LWBS (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.29). Institutional characteristics associated with LWBS were visits in metropolitan areas (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.66 to 2.70) and teaching institutions (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient, visit, and hospital characteristics are independently associated with LWBS. Prediction and benchmarking of LWBS rates should adjust for these factors.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估全国范围内未被诊治(LWBS)率,并确定预测 LWBS 的患者、就诊和医疗机构特征。

方法

本研究采用 1998 年至 2006 年全国医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)进行回顾性横断面分析。采用双变量和多变量分析来确定 LWBS 的预测因素。

结果

全国范围内,每年每 100 次急诊就诊中 LWBS 的发生率为 1.7 例(95%置信区间 [CI] = 1.6 至 1.9)。多变量分析显示,年龄处于极值的患者(<18 岁,比值比 [OR] = 0.80,95%CI = 0.66 至 0.96;≥65 岁,OR = 0.46,95%CI = 0.32 至 0.64)和疗养院居民(OR = 0.29,95%CI = 0.08 至 1.00)的 LWBS 发生率较低。非白种人(黑种人或非裔美国人(OR = 1.41,95%CI = 1.22 至 1.63)和西班牙裔(OR = 1.25,95%CI = 1.04 至 1.49)、医疗补助(OR = 1.47,95%CI = 1.27 至 1.70)、自付(OR = 1.96,95%CI = 1.65 至 2.32)或其他保险(OR = 2.09,95%CI = 1.74 至 2.52)的患者更有可能 LWBS。与 LWBS 相关的就诊特征包括肌肉骨骼(OR = 0.70,95%CI = 0.57 至 0.85)、损伤/中毒/不良事件(OR = 0.65,95%CI = 0.53 至 0.80)和其他(OR = 1.56,95%CI = 1.19 至 2.05)投诉。分诊 acuity 较低的就诊更有可能发生 LWBS(OR = 3.59,95%CI = 2.81 至 4.58),而与工作相关的就诊则不太可能发生 LWBS(OR = 0.19,95%CI = 0.12 至 0.29)。与 LWBS 相关的医疗机构特征包括在大都市区(OR = 2.11,95%CI = 1.66 至 2.70)和教学机构(OR = 1.33,95%CI = 1.06 至 1.67)就诊。

结论

多个患者、就诊和医院特征与 LWBS 独立相关。LWBS 率的预测和基准测试应考虑这些因素。

相似文献

1
National study of patient, visit, and hospital characteristics associated with leaving an emergency department without being seen: predicting LWBS.国家研究患者、就诊和医院特征与离开急诊未被诊治的关系:预测 LWBS。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;16(10):949-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00515.x.
2
Patients who leave without being seen in emergency departments: an analysis of predictive factors and outcomes.急诊未就诊患者:预测因素和结局分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):439-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01327.x.
3
Antipsychotic use at adult ambulatory care visits by patients with mental health disorders in the United States, 1996-2003: national estimates and associated factors.1996 - 2003年美国心理健康障碍患者在成人门诊护理就诊时的抗精神病药物使用情况:全国估计数及相关因素
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):723-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.017.
4
"Left without being seen": a national profile of children who leave the emergency department before evaluation.“未被诊治便离开”:对在评估前离开急诊科的儿童的全国性概况分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;52(6):599-605. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 May 1.
5
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1999 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:1999年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2001 Jun 25(320):1-34.
6
Patients who leave without being seen: their characteristics and history of emergency department use.未经诊治自行离开的患者:其特征及急诊科就诊史
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.05.022. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
7
Who comes back? Characteristics and predictors of return to emergency department services for pediatric mental health care.哪些患者会再次回到急诊部门寻求儿科心理健康服务?其特征和预测因素是什么?
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;17(2):177-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00633.x.
8
Epidemiology and characteristics of emergency departments visits by US adults with psychiatric disorder and antipsychotic mention from 2000 to 2004.2000年至2004年美国患有精神疾病并提及使用抗精神病药物的成年人急诊科就诊情况的流行病学及特征
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jun;23(6):1375-85. doi: 10.1185/030079907X187900.
9
Clinical and economic factors associated with ambulance use to the emergency department.与使用救护车前往急诊科相关的临床和经济因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):879-85. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
10
Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: focus on injury-related emergency department utilization and expenditures.美国儿童和青少年医疗保健年度报告:关注与伤害相关的急诊科就诊情况及支出
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):219-240.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.03.032. Epub 2008 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting patient risk of leaving without being seen using machine learning: a retrospective study in a single overcrowded emergency department.使用机器学习预测患者未就诊即离开的风险:在一个过度拥挤的急诊科进行的回顾性研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 15;25(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01287-9.
2
A Case-Crossover Study of Extreme Heat and Psychiatric Emergency Encounters Among Vulnerable Pregnant People.弱势群体中孕妇遭遇极端高温与精神科急诊的病例交叉研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1111/ppe.70044.
3
Reasons and Features of Patients Who Leave the Emergency Department Without Being Seen.
未就诊即离开急诊科患者的原因及特征
Emerg Med Int. 2025 Jan 11;2025:7199212. doi: 10.1155/emmi/7199212. eCollection 2025.
4
Characteristics of patients leaving the emergency department without being seen by a doctor: The first report from Türkiye.未接受医生诊治即离开急诊部的患者特征:来自土耳其的首次报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 15;103(46):e40543. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040543.
5
Investigation of emergency department abandonment rates using machine learning algorithms in a single centre study.使用机器学习算法对单一中心研究中的急诊科弃诊率进行调查。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 22;14(1):19513. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70545-w.
6
A study of "left against medical advice" emergency department patients: an optimized explainable artificial intelligence framework.一项关于“擅自离院”急诊科患者的研究:一个优化的可解释人工智能框架。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2024 Dec;27(4):485-502. doi: 10.1007/s10729-024-09684-5. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
7
Evaluation of different machine learning algorithms for predicting the length of stay in the emergency departments: a single-centre study.评估不同机器学习算法用于预测急诊科住院时间:一项单中心研究。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Jan 8;5:1323849. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1323849. eCollection 2023.
8
Healthcare utilization is increased in children living in urban areas, with ethnicity-related disparities: A big data analysis study.城市地区儿童的医疗保健利用率增加,存在与种族相关的差异:一项大数据分析研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Apr;183(4):1585-1594. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05373-7. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
9
Analysis of Reasons for Orthopaedic Walkouts from the Emergency Department in a Private Tertiary Care Centre.私立三级护理中心急诊科骨科患者擅自离开的原因分析。
Malays Orthop J. 2020 Nov;14(3):137-142. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2011.021.
10
Patients leaving without being seen from the emergency department: A prediction model using machine learning on a nationwide database.未就诊即离开急诊科的患者:基于全国性数据库运用机器学习的预测模型
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Sep 28;1(6):1684-1690. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12266. eCollection 2020 Dec.