Veselko Matjaz, Kastelec Matej
Department of Traumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, SI-1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar;87 Suppl 1(Pt 1):113-21. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02631.
The ideal treatment for avulsion fractures of the inferior pole of the patella has not yet been identified. The options include (1) internal fixation of the pole fragment and (2) resection of the avulsed fragment and repair of the patellar ligament to the patella. We are not aware of any previous study in which the results of internal fixation have been compared with those of pole resection. The purpose of the present study was to compare the long-term results of internal fixation (with use of a basket plate) with those of pole resection.
We retrospectively studied two groups of patients who had had operative treatment of an avulsion fracture of the inferior patellar pole between 1990 and 1997. Fourteen patients had had internal fixation with a basket plate, and fourteen had had pole resection with patellar ligament repair. Eleven patients who had had internal fixation (Group A) and thirteen patients who had had pole resection (Group B) were followed for an average of 4.6 years. The final evaluation was based on the patellofemoral score, and the patellar height was measured radiographically.
The average patellofemoral score (maximum, 100 points) was 94.1 points in Group A and 81.2 points in Group B. Significant differences between the groups were noted with regard to knee pain, level of activity, and range of motion. Normal patellar height was found in ten of eleven patients in Group A and in three of thirteen patients in Group B. Patella baja was significantly associated with a poor functional outcome.
In patients who have sustained an avulsion fracture of the inferior patellar pole, the normal height of the patella can be maintained by preserving the patellar pole. In contrast with pole resection, which requires postoperative immobilization, internal fixation with a basket plate allows for immediate mobilization and early weight-bearing. The present study indicates that internal fixation with use of a basket plate can provide better clinical results.
髌骨下极撕脱骨折的理想治疗方法尚未确定。治疗选择包括:(1)对骨折块进行内固定;(2)切除撕脱的骨折块,并将髌韧带修复至髌骨。我们未发现此前有任何研究将内固定的结果与切除骨折块的结果进行比较。本研究的目的是比较使用篮状钢板进行内固定与切除骨折块的长期结果。
我们回顾性研究了1990年至1997年间接受髌骨下极撕脱骨折手术治疗的两组患者。14例患者采用篮状钢板进行内固定,14例患者接受了骨折块切除及髌韧带修复。对11例接受内固定的患者(A组)和13例接受骨折块切除的患者(B组)进行了平均4.6年的随访。最终评估基于髌股关节评分,并通过X线片测量髌骨高度。
A组的平均髌股关节评分(满分100分)为94.1分,B组为81.2分。两组在膝关节疼痛、活动水平和活动范围方面存在显著差异。A组11例患者中有10例髌骨高度正常,B组13例患者中有3例正常。低位髌骨与功能预后不良显著相关。
在发生髌骨下极撕脱骨折的患者中,保留髌骨下极可维持髌骨的正常高度。与需要术后制动的骨折块切除不同,使用篮状钢板进行内固定可允许患者立即活动并早期负重。本研究表明,使用篮状钢板进行内固定可提供更好的临床结果。