• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向贫困人口的优质药品:德里合理用药项目的经验

Quality medicines for the poor: experience of the Delhi programme on rational use of drugs.

作者信息

Chaudhury R Roy, Parameswar R, Gupta U, Sharma S, Tekur U, Bapna J S

机构信息

India-WHO Essential Drugs Programme, Delhi Society for Promotion of Rational Use of Drugs, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2005 Mar;20(2):124-36. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czi015.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czi015
PMID:15746221
Abstract

Prior to 1994, most Delhi hospitals and dispensaries experienced constant shortages of essential medicines. There was erratic prescribing of expensive branded products, frequent complaints about poor drug quality and low patient satisfaction. Delhi took the lead in developing a comprehensive Drug Policy in 1994 and was the only Indian state to have such a comprehensive policy. The policy's main objective is to improve the availability and accessibility of quality essential drugs for all those in need. The Delhi Society for the Promotion of Rational Use of Drugs (DSPRUD), a non-governmental organization, worked in close collaboration with the Delhi Government and with universities to implement various components of the policy. The first Essential Drugs List (EDL) was developed, a centralized pooled procurement system was set up and activities promoting rational use of drugs were initiated. In 1997, the Delhi Programme was designated the INDIA-WHO Essential Drugs Programme by the World Health Organization. The EDL was developed by a committee consisting of a multidisciplinary group of experts using balanced criteria of efficacy, safety, suitability and cost. The first list contained 250 drugs for hospitals and 100 drugs for dispensaries; the list is revised every 2 years. The pooled procurement system, including the rigorous selection of suppliers with a minimum annual threshold turnover and the introduction of Good Manufacturing Practice inspections, resulted in the supply of good quality drugs and in holding down the procurement costs of many drugs. Bulk purchasing of carefully selected essential drugs was estimated to save nearly 30% of the annual drugs bill for the Government of Delhi, savings which were mobilized for procuring more drugs, which in turn improved availability of drugs (more than 80%) at health facilities. Further, training programmes for prescribers led to a positive change in prescribing behaviour, with more than 80% of prescriptions being from the EDL and patients receiving 70-95% of the drugs prescribed. These changes were achieved by changing managerial systems with minimal additional expenditure. The 'Delhi Model' has clearly demonstrated that such a programme can be introduced and implemented and can lead to a better use and availability of medicines.

摘要

1994年以前,德里的大多数医院和诊疗所基本药物一直短缺。存在高价品牌药品乱开处方的情况,药品质量差的投诉频繁,患者满意度低。德里于1994年率先制定了一项全面的药品政策,是印度唯一一个有如此全面政策的邦。该政策的主要目标是提高优质基本药物对所有有需要者的可获得性和可及性。德里促进合理用药协会(DSPRUD),一个非政府组织,与德里政府和大学密切合作以实施该政策的各个组成部分。制定了第一份基本药物清单(EDL),建立了集中采购系统,并启动了促进合理用药的活动。1997年,德里项目被世界卫生组织指定为印度-世卫组织基本药物项目。EDL由一个由多学科专家组成的委员会制定,采用了疗效、安全性、适用性和成本等平衡标准。第一份清单包含250种医院用药和100种诊疗所用药品;该清单每两年修订一次。集中采购系统,包括严格挑选年营业额有最低门槛的供应商以及引入药品生产质量管理规范检查,带来了优质药品的供应,并压低了许多药品的采购成本。据估计,批量采购精心挑选的基本药物为德里政府节省了近30%的年度药品账单,节省的资金被用于采购更多药品,这反过来又提高了医疗机构药品的可获得性(超过80%)。此外,针对开处方者的培训项目导致了处方行为的积极变化,超过80%的处方来自EDL,患者获得了所开处方药品的70 - 95%。这些改变是通过以最少的额外支出改变管理系统实现的。“德里模式”清楚地表明,这样一个项目可以引入并实施,且能带来药品的更好使用和可获得性。

相似文献

1
Quality medicines for the poor: experience of the Delhi programme on rational use of drugs.面向贫困人口的优质药品:德里合理用药项目的经验
Health Policy Plan. 2005 Mar;20(2):124-36. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czi015.
2
Prescribing and dispensing activities at the health facilities of a non-governmental organization.一家非政府组织的医疗机构中的处方开具与配药活动。
Natl Med J India. 2000 Jul-Aug;13(4):177-82.
3
Impact of decentralization on health services in Uganda: a look at facility utilization, prescribing and availability of essential drugs.权力下放对乌干达卫生服务的影响:对医疗机构利用率、基本药物处方及可及性的考察
East Afr Med J. 2004 Feb;Suppl:S2-7.
4
Can the selection and use of essential medicines decrease inappropriate drug use?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Jun;85(6):581-3. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.10.
5
The selection and use of essential medicines. Report of the WHO Expert Committee, 2002 (including the 12th Model list of essential medicines).基本药物的选择与使用。世界卫生组织专家委员会报告,2002年(包括第12版基本药物示范目录)
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;914:i-vi, 1-126.
6
Rational use of medicines - Indian perspective!药品的合理使用——印度视角!
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S47-8. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150684.
7
The selection and use of essential medicines.基本药物的遴选与使用。
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2007(946):1-162, back cover.
8
Essential drugs programmes in Africa.非洲的基本药物计划。
Afr Health. 1991 Nov;14(1):32-3.
9
Availability of essential medicines in Ethiopia: an efficiency-equity trade-off?埃塞俄比亚基本药物的可及性:效率与公平的权衡?
Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Nov;14(11):1394-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02383.x. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
10
[Access for all to quality drugs].全民可获取优质药品
Med Trop (Mars). 2002;62(4):396-400.

引用本文的文献

1
Intended and Unintended Impacts of '4+7' Volume-Based Drug Procurement on the Use of Drugs in China: A Natural Experimental Study.“4+7”带量采购对中国药品使用的预期和非预期影响:一项自然实验研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;13(6):686. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060686.
2
The impact of the national volume-based procurement policy on the use of policy-related drugs in Nanjing: an interrupted time-series analysis.国家基于量的采购政策对南京市政策相关药物使用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Sep 28;22(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02006-1.
3
Effects of volume-based procurement policy on the usage and expenditure of first-generation targeted drugs for non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation in China: an interrupted time series study.
基于量的采购政策对中国具有 EGFR 突变的非小细胞肺癌第一代靶向药物使用和支出的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 5;13(7):e064199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064199.
4
A systematic review of pooled procurement of medicines and vaccines: identifying elements of success.一项药品和疫苗集中采购的系统评价:确定成功要素。
Global Health. 2022 Jun 11;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00847-z.
5
Has the Volume-Based Drug Purchasing Approach Achieved Equilibrium among Various Stakeholders? Evidence from China.基于量的药物采购方法是否在各利益相关者之间实现了平衡?来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 3;19(7):4285. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074285.
6
The Impacts of National Centralized Drug Procurement Policy on Drug Utilization and Drug Expenditures: The Case of Shenzhen, China.国家集中带量采购政策对药品使用和药品支出的影响:以中国深圳为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 15;17(24):9415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249415.
7
Cost and cost drivers associated with setting-up a prime vendor system to complement the national medicines supply chain in Tanzania.在坦桑尼亚建立一个主要供应商系统以补充国家药品供应链的相关成本和成本驱动因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002681.
8
Impact of Implementation of "" Initiative on Quality Certification of District Hospitals to National Quality Assurance Standards.实施“倡议”对地区医院按照国家质量保证标准进行质量认证的影响。
Indian J Community Med. 2019 Jul-Sep;44(3):228-232. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_346_18.
9
International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries.初级保健医生会诊时间的国际差异:对67个国家的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(10):e017902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902.
10
Do changes to supply chains and procurement processes yield cost savings and improve availability of pharmaceuticals, vaccines or health products? A systematic review of evidence from low-income and middle-income countries.供应链和采购流程的变革是否能节省成本并提高药品、疫苗或健康产品的可及性?对低收入和中等收入国家证据的系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Apr 13;2(2):e000243. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000243. eCollection 2017.