Deacon Brett J, Abramowitz Jonathan S
Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Anxiety Disord. 2005;19(5):573-85. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.04.009.
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is widely acknowledged as the gold standard measure of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptom severity. Despite its popularity, a number of questions remain regarding the Y-BOCS' psychometric properties including: (a) whether obsessional and compulsive symptoms contribute independently to global OCD severity and (b) whether the Y-BOCS subscales are valid with respect to other measures of OCD. We examined these issues in a sample of 100 patients with a diagnosis of OCD. While our confirmatory factor analyses failed to reproduce any previously reported models of the Y-BOCS factor structure, exploratory factor analysis indicated a two-factor solution that assessed symptom severity (i.e., time, distress, and interference from obsessions and compulsions) as separate from resistance and control of obsessions and compulsions. In contrast to the Resistance/Control Subscale, the Severity Subscale demonstrated good psychometric properties and construct validity. Based on our findings we recommend revisions to scoring the Y-BOCS.
耶鲁-布朗强迫量表(Y-BOCS)被广泛认为是强迫症(OCD)症状严重程度的金标准测量方法。尽管它很受欢迎,但关于Y-BOCS的心理测量特性仍存在一些问题,包括:(a)强迫观念和强迫症状是否对全球强迫症严重程度有独立影响,以及(b)Y-BOCS分量表相对于其他强迫症测量方法是否有效。我们在100名被诊断为强迫症的患者样本中研究了这些问题。虽然我们的验证性因素分析未能重现任何先前报道的Y-BOCS因素结构模型,但探索性因素分析表明了一种双因素解决方案,该方案将症状严重程度(即时间、痛苦以及强迫观念和强迫行为的干扰)与对强迫观念和强迫行为的抵抗及控制分开评估。与抵抗/控制分量表不同,严重程度分量表表现出良好的心理测量特性和结构效度。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议对Y-BOCS的评分进行修订。