Shutt Cheryl K, Pounder June I, Page Sam R, Schaecher Barbara J, Woods Gail L
ARUP Laboratories, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Mar;43(3):1187-92. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1187-1192.2005.
The DiversiLab System, which includes microfluidics-based detection, reagent kits, and software for data processing and analysis, is an automated method using repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) for microbial strain typing. To assess the reliability of the DiversiLab System for strain characterization of Staphylococcus aureus, we tested clinical isolates sent to ARUP Laboratories for typing and compared results to those of pulsed field electrophoresis (PFGE) aided by the cluster analysis provided by BioNumerics software. spa typing was performed when the results of these two methods for an outbreak were not concordant. The study included 89 S. aureus isolates (65 mecA positive, 24 mecA negative) from 19 outbreaks (2 to 11 isolates/outbreak). The DiversiLab and PFGE-BioNumerics results were concordant for 15 of the 19 outbreaks. For the remaining four outbreaks, there was partial concordance between the two methods. spa typing results were the same as or more similar to rep-PCR results for three of those outbreaks and were more similar to PFGE results for one. With regard to performance, the DiversiLab system was considerably less labor intensive than PFGE and provided results in less than 24 h, compared with 2 to 3 days for PFGE. Additionally, the Web-based DiversiLab software provides standardized comparisons among isolates almost instantaneously and generates user-friendly, customized reports.
DiversiLab系统包括基于微流控的检测、试剂盒以及用于数据处理和分析的软件,是一种使用基于重复序列的聚合酶链反应(rep-PCR)进行微生物菌株分型的自动化方法。为了评估DiversiLab系统对金黄色葡萄球菌菌株特征分析的可靠性,我们对送往ARUP实验室进行分型的临床分离株进行了检测,并将结果与脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)的结果进行比较,后者借助BioNumerics软件提供的聚类分析。当两种方法对一次暴发的检测结果不一致时,进行葡萄球菌蛋白A(spa)分型。该研究纳入了来自19次暴发(每次暴发2至11株分离株)的89株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株(65株mecA阳性,24株mecA阴性)。在19次暴发中,有15次DiversiLab和PFGE-BioNumerics的结果一致。对于其余4次暴发,两种方法之间存在部分一致性。在其中3次暴发中,spa分型结果与rep-PCR结果相同或更相似,在1次暴发中与PFGE结果更相似。在性能方面,DiversiLab系统的劳动强度比PFGE低得多,且在不到24小时内即可得出结果,而PFGE则需要2至3天。此外,基于网络的DiversiLab软件几乎能即时提供分离株之间的标准化比较,并生成用户友好的定制报告。