Bais Aagje G, Rebolj Matejka, Snijders Peter J F, de Schipper Frits A, van der Meulen Dries A J, Verheijen René H M, Voorhorst Feja, van Ballegooijen Marjolein, Meijer Chris J L M, Helmerhorst Theo J M
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Int J Cancer. 2005 Aug 10;116(1):122-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20958.
In the Netherlands 2% of cervical smears in the cervical cancer screening program are read as borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cytology (BMD smear). Only in about 10% of these women a high-grade CIN lesion (CIN II-III) is present; therefore referral is for the majority unnecessary. In our study triage with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing was used to identify women at risk for development of high-grade CIN lesions after a repeat BMD smear. A "wait-and-see" period was incorporated allowing clearance of HPV and regression of the lesion. Women with a low-grade lesion, irrespective of their HPV status, were monitored at 12 months; women with a high-grade lesion were monitored at 6 and 12 months. Fifty-one of the 105 women (49%) were hrHPV negative at baseline; none of them showed progression of the lesion within the first year of follow-up (NPV 100%). High-grade CIN was present in 1 patient who was HPV negative at baseline (2%); she demonstrated regression after 12 months. Nineteen of the hrHPV positive women (35%) demonstrated a high-grade CIN lesion at baseline and 3 cleared hrHPV after 6 months, with a subsequent regression of CIN. Ten women remained hrHPV positive with persistence of high-grade CIN and were eventually treated. At baseline, 35 hrHPV positive women demonstrated a low-grade lesion, 19 remained hrHPV positive after 12 months and 5 developed high-grade CIN. Sixteen out of the 35 cleared the hrHPV infection without progression of the lesion. In conclusion, triage, using hrHPV testing for women with persistent BMD cytology, can select women who are not at risk for development of high-grade CIN. We recommend return to the screening program without referral for colposcopic examination if hrHPV is absent. For hrHPV positive women, a repeat hrHPV test after another 6 months is suggested. Referral is only required if persistence of hrHPV is established.
在荷兰,宫颈癌筛查项目中2%的宫颈涂片被判定为临界或轻度核异质细胞学结果(BMD涂片)。这些女性中只有约10%存在高级别CIN病变(CIN II - III);因此,对大多数人来说转诊是不必要的。在我们的研究中,采用高危型人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)检测进行分流,以识别在重复BMD涂片后有发展为高级别CIN病变风险的女性。纳入了一个“观察等待”期,以便HPV清除和病变消退。低级别病变的女性,无论其HPV状态如何,在12个月时进行监测;高级别病变的女性在6个月和12个月时进行监测。105名女性中有51名(49%)在基线时hrHPV阴性;她们在随访的第一年中均未出现病变进展(阴性预测值为100%)。1名基线时HPV阴性的患者存在高级别CIN(2%);她在12个月后病变消退。19名hrHPV阳性女性(35%)在基线时表现为高级别CIN病变,3名在6个月后清除了hrHPV,随后CIN消退。10名女性hrHPV持续阳性且高级别CIN持续存在,最终接受了治疗。基线时,35名hrHPV阳性女性表现为低级别病变,19名在12个月后仍为hrHPV阳性,5名发展为高级别CIN。35名中有16名清除了hrHPV感染且病变未进展。总之,对于持续存在BMD细胞学结果的女性,使用hrHPV检测进行分流可以筛选出没有发展为高级别CIN风险的女性。如果没有hrHPV,我们建议返回筛查项目,无需转诊进行阴道镜检查。对于hrHPV阳性的女性,建议在另外6个月后重复进行hrHPV检测。只有在确定hrHPV持续存在时才需要转诊。