Scheel Alexander K, Hermann Kay-Geert A, Kahler Elke, Pasewaldt Daniel, Fritz Jacqueline, Hamm Bernd, Brunner Edgar, Müller Gerhard A, Burmester Gerd R, Backhaus Marina
Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany.
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Mar;52(3):733-43. doi: 10.1002/art.20939.
To develop an ultrasonographic (US) synovitis scoring system suitable for evaluation of finger joint inflammation in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare semiquantitative US scoring with quantitative US measurements.
US was performed at the palmar and dorsal sides of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints in 10 healthy subjects and in the clinically more affected hand in 46 RA patients. Ten patients additionally underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Synovitis was measured, standardized, and scored according to a semiquantitative method. The 2 methods (semiquantitative US scoring, quantitative US) were compared and statistical cutoffs were identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. MRI results were compared with semiquantitative US scoring and quantitative US results. The optimal US scoring method from 6 joint combinations was identified (ROC curve analysis).
Synovitis was most frequently detected in the palmar proximal area (86% of affected joints). We found no significant differences between individual PIP joints or between individual MCP joints, indicating that all fingers within each of these joint groups should be treated equally for statistical calculations, although each joint group as a whole should be treated separately. The optimal cutoff point to distinguish between "health" and "pathology" was 0.6 mm both for MCP joints (sensitivity 94%, specificity 89%) and for PIP joints (sensitivity 90%, specificity 88%). There was no significant difference between semiquantitative US scores and quantitative US measurements. The best results for joint combinations were achieved using the "sum of 4 fingers" (second through fifth MCP and PIP joints) and "sum of 3 fingers" (second through fourth MCP and PIP joints) methods. Comparison of MRI results with semiquantitative US scores revealed high concordance.
US evaluation of finger joint synovitis can be considerably simplified by focusing on the palmar side and by applying semiquantitative grading instead of quantitative measurements. For evaluation of treatment efficacy based on synovitis in RA patients, we recommend using the "sum of 3 fingers" method in longitudinal trials.
开发一种适用于评估活动期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者手指关节炎症的超声(US)滑膜炎评分系统,并将半定量US评分与定量US测量结果进行比较。
对10名健康受试者以及46例RA患者临床受累更严重的一侧手的第二至第五掌指(MCP)关节和近端指间(PIP)关节的掌侧和背侧进行US检查。另外10例患者接受了磁共振成像(MRI)检查。根据半定量方法测量、标准化并对滑膜炎进行评分。比较这两种方法(半定量US评分、定量US),并使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定统计临界值。将MRI结果与半定量US评分和定量US结果进行比较。从6种关节组合中确定最佳的US评分方法(ROC曲线分析)。
滑膜炎最常出现在掌侧近端区域(86%的受累关节)。我们发现各个PIP关节之间或各个MCP关节之间没有显著差异,这表明在进行统计计算时,这些关节组内的所有手指应同等对待,尽管每个关节组作为一个整体应分别处理。区分“健康”和“病变”的最佳临界值对于MCP关节和PIP关节均为0.6 mm(MCP关节的敏感性为94%,特异性为89%;PIP关节的敏感性为90%,特异性为88%)。半定量US评分与定量US测量结果之间没有显著差异。使用“4指总和”(第二至第五MCP和PIP关节)和“3指总和”(第二至第四MCP和PIP关节)方法时,关节组合的结果最佳。MRI结果与半定量US评分的比较显示出高度一致性。
通过关注掌侧并应用半定量分级而非定量测量,可以大大简化对手指关节滑膜炎的US评估。对于基于RA患者滑膜炎评估治疗效果,我们建议在纵向试验中使用“3指总和”方法。