Freudenberg Nicholas, Galea Sandro, Vlahov David
Program in Urban Public Health, Hunter College, City University of New York, 425 East 25th Street, New York, New York 10010, USA.
J Community Health. 2005 Feb;30(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10900-004-6091-4.
Researchers have long studied urban health, both to describe the consequences of urban living and to design interventions to promote the health of people living in cities. Two approaches to understanding the impact of cities on health have been dominant, namely, urban health penalty and urban sprawl. The urban penalty approach posits that cities concentrate poor people and expose them to unhealthy physical and social environments. Urban sprawl focuses on the adverse health and environmental effects of urban growth into outlying areas. We propose a model that integrates these approaches and emphasizes urban living conditions as the primary determinant of health. The aim of the model is to move beyond describing the health-related characteristics of various urban populations towards identifying opportunities for intervention. Such a shift in framework enables meaningful comparisons that can inform public health activities at the appropriate level and evaluate their effectiveness in improving the health of urban populations. The model is illustrated with two examples from current urban public health practice.
长期以来,研究人员一直在研究城市健康问题,既为了描述城市生活的后果,也为了设计促进城市居民健康的干预措施。理解城市对健康影响的两种方法一直占据主导地位,即城市健康惩罚和城市扩张。城市惩罚方法认为,城市集中了贫困人口,并使他们暴露在不健康的自然和社会环境中。城市扩张则关注城市向周边地区发展所带来的不利健康和环境影响。我们提出了一个整合这些方法的模型,并强调城市生活条件是健康的主要决定因素。该模型的目的是超越描述不同城市人口的健康相关特征,转向识别干预机会。这种框架的转变能够进行有意义的比较,从而为适当层面的公共卫生活动提供信息,并评估其在改善城市人口健康方面的有效性。通过当前城市公共卫生实践中的两个例子对该模型进行了说明。