Merchant Shakil H, Amin Mitual B, Viswanatha David S, Malhotra Rajwant K, Moehlenkamp Cynthia, Joste Nancy E
Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2005 Feb;36(2):180-6. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.12.007.
Morphologic examination still forms the main diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of molar pregnancies. However, the criteria are subjective and show considerable interobserver variability among pathologists. Once a diagnosis of molar pregnancy is made, DNA ploidy studies help to differentiate a triploid partial mole from diploid complete mole (CM). However, with earlier diagnosis and therapeutic evacuation of molar pregnancies, the differentiation of molar pregnancies from early nonmolar placentation is becoming increasingly difficult. The p57(KIP2) gene ( CDKN1C ) is strongly paternally imprinted and expressed from the maternal allele. Because CM lacks a maternal genome, p57(KIP2) immunostaining is correspondingly absent, whereas hydropic abortuses and partial mole show positive staining. We compared the use of p57(KIP2) staining in the differential diagnosis of 68 morphologically challenging cases of early first-trimester hydropic placentas. Diagnosis based on p57(KIP2) staining was compared with the original diagnosis based on morphology and DNA ploidy analysis. Concordant results were obtained in 65 of 68 cases studied. In 2 of 3 cases with a discordant diagnosis, microsatellite DNA genotyping analysis agreed with the results of p57(KIP2) staining, confirming that positive p57(KIP2) staining is a highly sensitive and specific marker for excluding CM in this setting. In addition, p57(KIP2) staining has the advantage of differentiating hydropic abortuses from CMs, a distinction not made by ploidy analysis. p57(KIP2) staining can be used in concert with ploidy studies to refine the diagnosis of early molar pregnancies.
形态学检查仍然是葡萄胎妊娠鉴别诊断中的主要诊断工具。然而,其标准具有主观性,且病理学家之间的观察者间差异很大。一旦做出葡萄胎妊娠的诊断,DNA倍体研究有助于区分三倍体部分性葡萄胎和二倍体完全性葡萄胎(CM)。然而,随着葡萄胎妊娠的早期诊断和治疗性清宫,将葡萄胎妊娠与早期非葡萄胎胎盘形成区分开来变得越来越困难。p57(KIP2)基因(CDKN1C)由父系强烈印记并从母本等位基因表达。由于完全性葡萄胎缺乏母本基因组,因此相应地缺乏p57(KIP2)免疫染色,而水肿性流产和部分性葡萄胎则显示阳性染色。我们比较了p57(KIP2)染色在68例形态学上具有挑战性的孕早期水肿胎盘鉴别诊断中的应用。将基于p57(KIP2)染色的诊断与基于形态学和DNA倍体分析的原始诊断进行比较。在68例研究病例中的65例中获得了一致的结果。在3例诊断不一致的病例中,有2例微卫星DNA基因分型分析与p57(KIP2)染色结果一致,证实了在这种情况下,p57(KIP2)染色阳性是排除完全性葡萄胎的高度敏感和特异的标志物。此外,p57(KIP2)染色具有将水肿性流产与完全性葡萄胎区分开来的优势,而倍体分析无法做到这一点。p57(KIP2)染色可与倍体研究一起用于完善早期葡萄胎妊娠的诊断。