Lindqvist Rikard, Stenbeck Magnus, Diderichsen Finn
Centre for Epidemiology, National Board of Health and Welfare, SE-106 30 Stockholm, Sweden.
Health Policy. 2005 Apr;72(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.06.003.
The objective was to investigate how differences among hospitals in the shift from in-patient care to day surgery and a reduced hospital length of stay affect the sick-leave period for female patients surgically treated for breast cancer. All women aged 18-64 who were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2000 were selected from the National Cancer Register and combined with data from the sick-leave database of the National Social Insurance Board and the National Hospital Discharge Register (N = 1834). A multi-factorial model was fitted to the data to investigate how differences in hospital care practice affected the length of sick-leave. The main output measure was the number of sick-leave days after discharge during the year following surgery. The confounders used included age, type of primary surgical treatment, whether or not lymph node dissection was performed, labour-market status, county, and readmission. Women treated with breast-conserving surgery had a 54.7-day (-71.9 < or = CI(95%) < or = -37.5) shorter sick-leave period than those with more invasive surgery. The day-surgery cases had 24.3 (-47.5 < or = CI(95%) < or = -1.1) days shorter sick-leave than those who received overnight care. The effect of the hospital median length of stay (LOS) was U-shaped, suggesting that hospitals with a median LOS that is either short or long are associated with longer sick-leave. In the intermediate range, women treated in hospitals with a median LOS of 2 days had 22 days longer sick-leave than those treated in hospitals with a mean LOS of 3 days. This is possibly a sign of sub-optimising.
目的是调查医院在从住院治疗向日间手术转变以及缩短住院时间方面的差异如何影响接受乳腺癌手术治疗的女性患者的病假时长。从国家癌症登记处选取了2000年被诊断为乳腺癌的所有18 - 64岁女性,并将其与国家社会保险局病假数据库和国家医院出院登记处的数据相结合(N = 1834)。对数据拟合了一个多因素模型,以研究医院护理实践中的差异如何影响病假时长。主要输出指标是术后一年出院后的病假天数。所使用的混杂因素包括年龄、初次手术治疗类型、是否进行淋巴结清扫、劳动力市场状况、县以及再次入院情况。接受保乳手术的女性比接受更具侵入性手术的女性病假时长缩短了54.7天(-71.9 ≤ 95%置信区间 ≤ -37.5)。日间手术病例比接受过夜护理的病例病假天数缩短了24.3天(-47.5 ≤ 95%置信区间 ≤ -1.1)。医院中位住院时间(LOS)的影响呈U形曲线,这表明中位住院时间短或长的医院与更长的病假时长相关。在中间范围内,在中位住院时间为2天的医院接受治疗的女性比在平均住院时间为3天的医院接受治疗的女性病假天数多22天。这可能是优化不足的一个迹象。